Understanding photography’s material and chemical histories reveals hidden colonial and environmental impacts, guiding artists and institutions toward more sustainable, ethically aware image‑making practices.
The panel titled “The Materiality of Photography” convened at Paroto, featuring Art Forum editor Pablo Larios and artists Dion Lee, Michelle Henning, and Aspen Mays. Their discussion framed photography not as a purely visual medium but as a chemical practice embedded in histories of extraction, labor, and environmental impact, especially as AI and digital workflows dominate contemporary discourse.
The speakers highlighted how the decline of traditional dark‑room labs threatens analog techniques, prompting a resurgence of alternative processes—expired film, cyanotypes, indigo‑dyeing, and fossil‑like stone prints. They connected these material experiments to broader concerns about sustainability, the toxic legacies of photographic chemicals, and the ways in which scientific knowledge shapes artistic practice.
Concrete examples illustrated these themes: Dion Lee’s stone‑and‑cyanotype works envision a non‑human landscape that photographs itself; Aspen Mays dyed a silver gelatin print with indigo derived from her great‑grandmother’s textiles, invoking the colonial history of indigo production; Michelle Henning’s forthcoming "A Dirty History of Photography" traces Ilford’s fog‑induced emulsion failures and the intertwined narratives of industrial pollution and empire.
Collectively, the dialogue underscores a pressing need for the photographic community to reckon with material provenance, archival stability, and the political ecology of image‑making. By foregrounding chemistry and extraction, the panel suggests new pathways for sustainable, historically informed practice in an era increasingly dominated by digital and AI technologies.
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...