If you want to spice up Thanksgiving with fresh anti-Big-Tech ideas, my brother's book "The War on Life" just launched in English: https://t.co/rc8zSHqAov Here's my take on his book. We're all aware that artificial intelligence and other tech is transforming life on Earth at an accelerating pace. Some worship tech as a new religion, whose central credo is that more tech is always better, however it's used. Some ever take this literally, aiming to build a digital god ("the sand god") they call superintelligence. But is this technologization really making things better for life on Earth and, if so, for whom? We've already driven about half of all species extinct. In the US, the government has reported a loneliness epidemic, 30% of female high school students have seriously considered suicide, and only 37% of people think things are better than 50 years ago. In this thought-provoking book, my brother Per argues that this is all part of a larger trend he calls "the War on Life", whose origins trace back to ancient times when major monotheistic religions redefined our relationship with nature: rather than nature being an ecosystem that we should revere and live in harmony with, life in all its forms (including people) became a resource to be commodified, dominated and exploited. This commoditization process was accelerated by a race to the bottom between the non-living entities we refer to as for-profit corporations. Part of this trend involves manipulating us to prefer artificial over natural: junk food over healthy, drugs over inspiring activities, screens over nature, texting over talking, and porn over physical intimacy. AI is now taking this to new levels, with some preferring AI companions over human relationships, and others hoping to delegate ever more human agency and influence to that alluring sand god. My own view is that technology isn't evil, but also not morally good. It can and should be a tool that can be used for either. We should use it to empower us, not to replace, manipulate or overpower us. There is indeed a war on life, and with top tech CEO's hoping to summon the sand god by the end of this decade, its final battle is upon is. This book helps us see the battle lines. Are you ready to fight for Team Life?
Here's our paper: https://t.co/RmNft3zU5Z
Excited to present our new AI paper as a @NeurIPSConf spotlight next week: we find that the problem of controlling artificial superintelligence remains unsolved. With simulations and scaling laws, we find that an implementation of the least unpromising...
The AI company @CharacterAI_app is IMHO doing evil, and I don't say this lightly. I've never been this upset during an interview before – it came right after Megan Garcia described how CharacterAI's bot encouraged her late son to commit...
95% of Americans don't want a race to AGI and superintelligence, but instead want better AI tools to cure diseases and solve problems. Here at @WebSummit, I discuss how this controllable "95% AI" can gives us almost all the AI...
If a country or company builds superintelligence, they'll and up *losing* power, not gaining power – this thought-provoking study explains why:
It's noteworthy that Altman and other AI CEO's are also openly trying to develop AI that can figure out how to improve AI - which I view as digital gain-of-function research. What could possibly go wrong...?
Elon says the quiet part out loud: instead of focusing on controllable AI tools, AI companies are racing toward a future where machines are in charge. If you oppose this, please join about 100,000 of us as a signatory...
Let's stop the corporate welfare for crybaby AI companies and treat them like we treat all other companies: with legally binding safety standards.

Excited that our paper "Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretability" (link in reply) got accepted to TMLR. We still lack in understanding of how today's strongest AI systems work! https://t.co/X9dhWSiwIf

Do your homework Pedro: Here's a detailed quantitative calculation concluding that the particle collider disaster risk is tiny, and there's nothing comparable for the superintelligence risk – just vibes and name calling. https://t.co/oUU3owxaMv

Fellow AI safety nerds: Which side of the AI safety community are you in? https://t.co/rzEVUhTyps https://t.co/yT0QMGbolF

A stunningly broad coalition has come out against Skynet: AI researchers, faith leaders, business pioneers, policymakers, NatSec folks and actors stand together, from Bannon & Beck to Hinton, Wozniak & Prince Harry. We stand together because we want a...