Teams chasing microservices reflexively can incur significant operational and debugging costs; adopting modular monoliths with DDD lets organizations capture modularity and scalability benefits while minimizing unnecessary distribution and complexity. This approach enables safer, more deliberate evolution toward microservices when domain needs justify it.
At DDD Europe 2025, Omphile Matheolane argued that modular monoliths—structured, well-partitioned single applications guided by Domain-Driven Design—offer a practical, scalable alternative to hastily adopted microservices. He outlined the common downsides of microservices (debugging complexity, high operational overhead, and distributed coupling) and warned against distributed monoliths as combining the worst of both worlds. Matheolane described the “big ball of mud” monolith anti-pattern and recommended moving incrementally from monolith to modular monolith before extracting microservices. He emphasized reducing accidental complexity through clear boundaries and DDD to make systems easier to understand, modify, and operate.
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...