Global Economy News and Headlines
  • All Technology
  • AI
  • Autonomy
  • B2B Growth
  • Big Data
  • BioTech
  • ClimateTech
  • Consumer Tech
  • Crypto
  • Cybersecurity
  • DevOps
  • Digital Marketing
  • Ecommerce
  • EdTech
  • Enterprise
  • FinTech
  • GovTech
  • Hardware
  • HealthTech
  • HRTech
  • LegalTech
  • Nanotech
  • PropTech
  • Quantum
  • Robotics
  • SaaS
  • SpaceTech
AllNewsDealsSocialBlogsVideosPodcastsDigests

Global Economy Pulse

EMAIL DIGESTS

Daily

Every morning

Weekly

Sunday recap

NewsDealsSocialBlogsVideosPodcasts
Global EconomyNewsUS Mineral Supply Chains Remain Exposed to China Chokehold: USGS Report
US Mineral Supply Chains Remain Exposed to China Chokehold: USGS Report
Global EconomyCommodities

US Mineral Supply Chains Remain Exposed to China Chokehold: USGS Report

•February 6, 2026
0
MINING.com
MINING.com•Feb 6, 2026

Why It Matters

Import dependence on China exposes U.S. manufacturing and defense sectors to geopolitical risk, prompting urgent policy and investment actions to secure critical mineral supplies.

Key Takeaways

  • •US imports 100% of 16 minerals, up from 15
  • •Over half of consumption relies on imports for 54 minerals
  • •China supplies ~70% of US rare earth imports
  • •US plans $12B critical mineral stockpile to cut China reliance
  • •Permitting reforms needed; mines take average 29 years to develop

Pulse Analysis

The latest USGS annual mineral commodities summary paints a stark picture of America’s growing reliance on foreign sources for essential non‑fuel minerals. Sixteen commodities now see 100% import dependence, and more than half of the nation’s apparent consumption of 54 minerals comes from abroad. Many of these are classified as critical, including arsenic, graphite, gallium and titanium sponge, underscoring a systemic vulnerability that could affect everything from electronics to clean‑energy technologies.

Geopolitics amplifies the risk. China supplies nearly half of the United States’ imports of arsenic and graphite and dominates roughly 70% of rare‑earth shipments, a sector vital for defense and renewable‑energy applications. In response, the administration has announced a $12 billion strategic stockpile and is rallying allies into a preferential trade bloc for critical minerals. These moves aim to diversify supply chains, but they also highlight the strategic imperative of reducing reliance on a single, state‑controlled exporter.

Domestic production faces its own hurdles. Industry leaders point to an average 29‑year timeline to develop a new mine in the United States, largely due to permitting bottlenecks and regulatory uncertainty. Without comprehensive reform, the country may struggle to meet its de‑risking goals despite significant federal investment. Streamlined approvals, clear policy signals, and public‑private partnerships are essential to accelerate mining projects and build a resilient, home‑grown critical‑minerals ecosystem.

US mineral supply chains remain exposed to China chokehold: USGS report

A new report by the US Geological Survey reveals that the United States has grown more reliant on foreign imports of minerals over the past year, highlighting the increased urgency to bolster its domestic supply chains.

In its annual mineral commodities summary published on Friday, the USGS found that the country was 100% import reliant last year for 16 out of the 90 non-fuel commodities that it tracked. In addition, the US relied more than one-half of its apparent consumption for 54 of the minerals, the report showed.

Credit: USGS

In comparison, the 2024 data showed 100% import reliance for 15 commodities and more than one-half import reliant for 46 minerals, the USGS said.

As highlighted in the report, the United States is totally reliant on its imports of arsenic (all forms), asbestos, cesium, fluorspar, gallium, graphite (natural), indium, manganese, mica (natural), niobium (columbium), rubidium, scandium, strontium, tantalum, titanium (sponge metal) and yttrium. Most of these are on the USGS critical minerals list, with asbestos, mica and strontium being the only absentees.

An additional 20 critical minerals had a net import reliance of greater than 50%, down from 28 in 2024, USGS noted.

China’s chokehold

For many of the USGS critical minerals, China features prominently as a key supply source, accounting for nearly half of its arsenic and graphite imports, 55% of its antimony, and 70% of rare earths.

“This report underscores just how hard it is to put a dent in China’s decades-long strategy to dominate the world’s minerals markets,” said Rich Nolan, president and CEO of the National Mining Association (NMA), in a press release.

Another leading source of critical minerals is Canada, which supplies the aluminum, gallium, potash and zinc to the US. For copper and silver, which were recently added to the USGS list, Chile and Mexico were the leading import sources respectively.

The USGS report comes at a time when the US government is intensifying efforts to establish a critical minerals supply chain that is independent of China. Earlier this week, the Trump administration unveiled plans for a $12 billion stockpile of critical minerals. Vice President JD Vance followed that up by announcing plans to marshal allies into a preferential trade bloc for critical minerals.

“We have an administration and Congress that have united around the need to de-risk our supply chains and reshore minerals production and processing, but it still takes an average of 29 years to bring a mine online in the US,” Nolan said.

“That’s far too long. Quick action by the administration has been key in jumpstarting domestic mining efforts but we need Congress to act on permitting reform to create the kind of lasting certainty that mining companies need in order to make long-term investments in US projects.”

Read Original Article
0

Comments

Want to join the conversation?

Loading comments...