Kurdish political forces could become a decisive lever in any U.S. effort to topple Iran’s regime, while their involvement also raises the risk of a wider regional conflict and reshapes power dynamics in Iraq’s Kurdish autonomous area.
In a France 24 interview, former KDPI deputy secretary‑general Asso Hassan Zadeh outlined the Kurdish political agenda amid the widening Iran‑Israel‑US confrontation. He rejected the “separatist” label applied to Iranian Kurdish parties, insisting their program seeks full national rights for Kurds inside a democratic, federal Iran. Zadeh described how the Iranian army has recently intensified air strikes on Kurdish headquarters, bases and civilian family camps along the Iran‑Iraq border, warning that Tehran is preparing a possible ground offensive.
Zadeh said the Kurdish coalition has entered “unprecedented” contacts with the United States, discussing how Kurdish forces could help catalyze regime change if Tehran falls. He emphasized that any Kurdish participation would require strict conditions: a guaranteed no‑fly zone, U.S. or allied air cover, and safeguards against the regime using Iranian civilians as human shields. While acknowledging limited military capability, he highlighted the Peshmerga’s deep local knowledge, popular mobilization capacity, and the strategic leverage of Kurdish‑controlled territories.
Notable remarks included, “We fight for national rights within a democratic Iran,” and “Our parties have the potential to shift U.S. policy toward a democratic alternative.” Zadeh also warned that Iranian troops are massing on the border, and that Iraqi Kurdistan is being hit by cross‑border strikes, placing Baghdad’s autonomous region in a precarious diplomatic position between Tehran and Washington.
The interview signals a possible realignment of U.S. strategy in the region, as Kurdish actors seek to translate political leverage into concrete security guarantees. If Tehran’s regime collapses, Kurdish participation could shape the post‑war settlement, but missteps risk a broader escalation that would entangle Iraq’s Kurdish region and destabilize the already volatile Middle‑East landscape.
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...