He Worked Directly for the Elite And It’s Worse Than You Think
Why It Matters
If accurate, Perkins’s account frames international development finance as a tool of economic domination that shapes geopolitics, resource conflicts, and persistent inequality—raising questions about accountability for private consultants, multilateral lenders, and state influence. Understanding these claims matters for policymakers, investors, and citizens assessing the drivers of foreign intervention and debt dependency.
Summary
John Perkins, a former self-described "economic hit man," says he spent decades working for private consulting firms paid by the U.S. government to persuade developing countries to take massive loans for infrastructure that primarily benefited multinational contractors and local elites. According to Perkins, those loans funneled most funds back to U.S. companies, saddled countries with crushing debt, and prioritized resource extraction over public welfare. He alleges that when leaders resisted this system, covert operatives—"jackals"—were used to foment coups or eliminate presidents, citing disputed plane crashes that killed Panama's Omar Torrijos and Ecuador's Jaime Roldós. Perkins wrote about these practices in Confessions of an Economic Hit Man after 9/11, claiming he faced bribes, threats, and secrecy to keep silent.
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...