#727 A Data Center in Every Community with Christopher Jordan, National League of Cities

GovLove: A Podcast About Local Government

#727 A Data Center in Every Community with Christopher Jordan, National League of Cities

GovLove: A Podcast About Local GovernmentMay 8, 2026

Why It Matters

Understanding the trade‑offs of hosting AI data centers is crucial for local leaders who must balance fiscal gains with sustainability and resident quality of life. As AI services expand rapidly, the decisions made today will shape regional energy use, water resources, and economic development for years to come.

Key Takeaways

  • Hyperscale AI data centers use 100+ MW, doubling electricity demand
  • Communities gain tax revenue but see few permanent jobs
  • Evaporative cooling can consume 80% of water, rarely reclaimed
  • Southwest hosts two‑thirds new data centers, prompting utility‑cost protests
  • Lack of disclosure fuels community backlash, causing project delays

Pulse Analysis

Today's municipalities are confronting a new kind of infrastructure: hyperscale AI data centers. Defined as facilities drawing 100 megawatts or more, these campuses power large‑language‑model training and 24/7 inference services that underpin cloud applications, video generation, and autonomous systems. The rush to build them mirrors a modern space race, with tech giants racing to secure U.S. soil for national‑security and competitive reasons. For local leaders, the conversation is no longer theoretical; the sheer scale of power demand and the speed of siting decisions are reshaping land‑use planning across the country.

Proponents tout substantial fiscal upside: property‑tax abatements in places like Loudoun County, Virginia, have helped lower resident tax burdens by roughly 25 percent while attracting dozens of facilities. Construction spikes generate short‑term jobs, yet permanent staffing remains low—often one employee per 5,000 to 10,000 square feet. The trade‑off lies in resource intensity. Nationwide data centers already account for about 4 percent of electricity use, a share projected to climb to 8‑10 percent by 2030. Water consumption is equally stark; evaporative cooling can evaporate up to 80 percent of intake water, a concern amplified in drought‑prone Southwest markets such as Phoenix, Salt Lake City, and Reno.

Community resistance is rising where transparency falters. In Tucson and Indianapolis, leaked non‑disclosure agreements sparked protests that forced developers to pause or abandon projects. Residents cite soaring utility bills—some seeing 200 percent spikes—and water‑use anxieties, especially in arid counties. Local governments therefore need clear permitting frameworks, public‑utility coordination, and robust environmental impact assessments. The National League of Cities’ AI and Innovation program is already guiding municipalities on best practices, from disclosure policies to climate‑smart cooling technologies. By balancing economic incentives with sustainable resource management, cities can decide whether a data center becomes a catalyst for growth or a source of contention.

Episode Description

Christopher Jordan, AI and Innovation Program Manager for the National League of Cities, joined the podcast to talk about data centers. He shared the responses he has seen from citizens to data centers coming to their communities. He discussed the benefits that local governments are trying to extract from data center projects to make these deals more palatable. He also shared advice to local leaders deciding whether to allow a data center in their community.

Host: Toney Thompson

Show Notes

Comments

Want to join the conversation?

Loading comments...