The Best and Worst Areas for Outdoor Play Have Been Revealed, See How Yours Compares

The Best and Worst Areas for Outdoor Play Have Been Revealed, See How Yours Compares

Netmums
NetmumsApr 28, 2026

Why It Matters

The rankings highlight where children can safely play outdoors, influencing parental decisions and prompting local authorities to invest in safer streets and more green space. Improving these factors can reduce injuries and boost community wellbeing.

Key Takeaways

  • Westmorland & Furness scores 7.47, highest in England
  • Cumbria’s Cumberland ranks second with 6.59 safety score
  • Stoke‑on‑Trent records lowest score 2.60, limited 20 mph zones
  • Blackpool’s antisocial incidents triple national average, raising risk

Pulse Analysis

Parents across England are increasingly wary of letting children roam unsupervised, and a new analysis from outdoor‑toy specialist Outdoor Toys quantifies that anxiety with a detailed safety score for every local authority. The methodology blends child population density with tangible infrastructure data—parks per 10,000 children, zebra crossings per kilometre, 20 mph road coverage, bicycle theft rates and antisocial‑behaviour incidents—producing a normalized Child Safety Score out of ten. By translating raw government statistics into an easy‑to‑read ranking, the study offers a practical tool for families planning summer outings and for councils seeking data‑driven improvements.

The top‑performing areas, notably Westmorland and Furness (7.47) and neighboring Cumberland (6.59), combine abundant green space with low child density and robust traffic calming measures. Westmorland and Furness boasts 117.9 parks per 10,000 children and 17.5% of its urban roads limited to 20 mph, far exceeding national averages. Such environments reduce exposure to traffic hazards and antisocial incidents, creating a more inviting setting for independent play. These findings reinforce the link between well‑planned urban design and child wellbeing, suggesting that replicating these conditions could elevate safety scores elsewhere.

Conversely, urban districts like Stoke‑on‑Trent (2.60), Blackpool (2.92) and Newham (high pedestrian casualties) illustrate the risks of dense traffic, few speed‑limit zones and limited park provision. Stoke‑on‑Trent’s 3.1% 20 mph coverage and Blackpool’s three‑fold rise in antisocial offences underscore the urgency for targeted interventions—expanding low‑speed zones, installing more crossings, and increasing green space. For policymakers, the report provides a clear roadmap: prioritize speed reductions, boost park accessibility, and address antisocial behaviour to create safer outdoor environments for the next generation.

The best and worst areas for outdoor play have been revealed, see how yours compares

Comments

Want to join the conversation?

Loading comments...