The New Space Station Gold Rush: Which Companies Are Actually Ready for LEO?

Why It Matters

Commercial stations will become the backbone of orbital research, manufacturing, and tourism, ensuring continuous human presence after the ISS. Their success will unlock new revenue streams and accelerate microgravity‑based industries.

Key Takeaways

• Vast Space aims launch Haven‑1 Q1 2027
• Axiom expands via ISS‑attached modules, self‑sustaining by 2028
• Starlab offers single‑launch large‑volume habitat by 2029
• Orbital Reef targets mixed‑use business park with inflatable modules
• NASA funds via Space Act Agreements, not firm‑fixed contracts

Pulse Analysis

The retirement of the International Space Station marks a pivotal transition from government‑run laboratories to a commercial ecosystem that treats low‑Earth orbit as a business park. NASA’s new Commercial Low‑Earth‑Orbit Destinations program positions the agency as an anchor tenant, providing funding through milestone‑based Space Act Agreements rather than long‑term service contracts. This model reduces fiscal risk for the agency while incentivizing private firms to prove critical technologies—life‑support, radiation shielding, and autonomous docking—before committing to large‑scale operations.

Among the contenders, strategies diverge sharply. Axiom Space leverages the existing ISS infrastructure, attaching modular habitats that will detach and become an independent station, a low‑risk path that maintains continuous crew support. In contrast, Vast Space pursues speed, field‑testing a single‑module Haven‑1 in 2027 to demonstrate rapid‑deployment capabilities before scaling to a larger Haven‑2 via Starship. Voyager Space’s Starlab opts for a one‑shot, fully integrated launch that promises immediate research capacity, while Blue Origin and Sierra Space’s Orbital Reef envision a mixed‑use platform with inflatable modules that maximize habitable volume for research, manufacturing, and tourism. Emerging players like Max Space add niche inflatable concepts, further expanding the design palette.

The commercial race carries profound economic implications. Microgravity manufacturing—ranging from perfect crystal growth to 3‑D bioprinting—could become a multi‑billion‑dollar sector if access costs fall. Reliable private stations also reduce dependence on costly government‑only operations, allowing NASA to reallocate resources to deep‑space missions such as Artemis. However, success hinges on meeting stringent safety standards, securing a steady flow of paying customers, and synchronizing launch schedules to avoid a post‑ISS capability gap. The firms that master these challenges will shape the next era of orbital commerce and scientific discovery.

The New Space Station Gold Rush: Which Companies Are Actually Ready for LEO?

February 15 2026

Key Takeaways

• Multiple private companies are developing space stations to replace the International Space Station by 2030.

• Vast Space leads the race with a planned launch of the Haven‑1 module in early 2027.

• NASA has shifted its funding strategy to support industry demonstrations through Space Act Agreements.

---

Who Will Replace the ISS?

The landscape of human activity in space is undergoing a fundamental shift as the era of government‑run orbital laboratories nears its conclusion. For decades, the International Space Station has served as the primary hub for microgravity research and international cooperation. With the ISS slated for retirement at the end of this decade, a new group of commercial entities is emerging to build and operate the next generation of orbital outposts. As of February 2026, several key players are actively competing to provide the infrastructure necessary to maintain a continuous human presence in low Earth orbit.

The transition from public to private stations isn’t just about changing ownership; it represents a move toward a “business park” model in space, where companies offer research labs, tourist accommodations, and manufacturing facilities to a global clientele. NASA is facilitating this transition through its Commercial Low‑Earth‑Orbit Destinations program, acting as an anchor tenant rather than the sole operator. This approach allows the agency to focus its resources on deep‑space exploration, such as the Artemis program, while relying on the private sector for routine orbital operations.

---

Axiom Space and the Incremental Expansion

Axiom Space occupies a unique position among the competitors because its strategy involves building directly onto the existing ISS. Headquartered in Houston, Axiom has been conducting private‑astronaut missions to the orbital lab for several years to gain operational experience. Its plan involves launching a series of commercial modules that will initially dock with the station’s Harmony port. By 2028, Axiom intends to have enough modules attached to operate as a self‑sustaining segment.

When the ISS is eventually decommissioned, the Axiom segment will detach and become an independent, free‑flying station. This incremental approach reduces the risk of a capability gap and allows for gradual testing of life‑support and power systems while still supported by the larger facility. The company has already completed the final pressure‑vessel welds for its first module and is currently conducting thermal‑vacuum testing on its next‑generation spacesuits, which are intended for use both on the commercial station and by NASA astronauts on the lunar surface.

---

Vast Space and the Sprint to Orbit

While other companies are planning large, multi‑module complexes, Vast Space has taken a “hardware‑rich” approach focused on speed and simplicity. The California‑based startup is currently integrating its first station, Haven‑1, which is scheduled for launch on a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket in the first quarter of 2027. This single‑module station is designed to host four‑person crews for short stays of up to ten days, serving as a technology demonstrator for more ambitious projects.

Vast Space recently achieved a significant milestone with the success of its Haven Demo mission in late 2025, making it the only commercial station developer to have successfully operated its own spacecraft in orbit. Following Haven‑1, the company plans to pitch a much larger modular system called Haven‑2 to NASA. The proposed successor would utilize the massive launch capacity of the SpaceX Starship to deliver expanded living and working quarters. Vast’s strategy emphasizes vertical integration, meaning it designs and manufactures the majority of its components in‑house to maintain tight control over the development timeline.

---

Voyager Space and the Starlab Alliance

The Starlab project represents a major international collaboration led by Voyager Space in partnership with European aerospace giant Airbus. Unlike the modular builds of their competitors, Starlab is designed to launch as a single, fully integrated station. This “one‑and‑done” launch strategy aims to provide immediate full research capability without the need for complex in‑space assembly. The station’s habitable volume is intended to exceed that of the Chinese Tiangong space station, offering substantial room for laboratories and industrial activities.

In late 2025 and early 2026, the Starlab team solidified its supply chain by selecting Northrop Grumman to provide cargo‑resupply services. Northrop Grumman, which previously pursued its own independent station concept, pivoted to contribute its proven Cygnus spacecraft technology to the Starlab effort. The alliance also includes Japanese firm Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and the Canadian robotics company MDA Space (known for the Canadarm2). The project is positioning itself as the most direct replacement for the ISS’s scientific and industrial throughput.

---

Blue Origin and the Orbital Reef Business Park

Blue Origin, the aerospace company founded by Jeff Bezos, is developing a station called Orbital Reef in collaboration with Sierra Space. The vision for Orbital Reef is that of a “mixed‑use business park” in orbit, catering to researchers, manufacturers, and space tourists alike. The design features large windows for Earth viewing and modular attachments that can be customized for different clients. A centerpiece of the project is the LIFE habitat from Sierra Space, an inflatable module that provides significant interior volume once expanded in space.

Development of Orbital Reef has faced public scrutiny regarding the partnership between the lead companies, but both remain committed to the NASA program. Sierra Space has been actively testing its inflatable technology, including successful “burst tests” where modules are pressurized until they fail to determine safety limits. Meanwhile, Blue Origin is leveraging its New Glenn heavy‑lift rocket to provide the transportation needed to loft the station’s heavy core components. The station is expected to support a crew of ten in its growth configuration, making it one of the largest proposed commercial destinations.

---

Emerging Specialized Entrants

Beyond the primary competitors, new specialized entries are beginning to appear. Max Space is proposing a station based on high‑volume inflatable technology that could offer up to 350 m³ of space in a single launch. These designs focus on maximizing the “living room” available to astronauts, which is often a limiting factor in metallic‑tube‑based designs. Smaller or more focused ventures often target niche markets, such as orbital cloud computing or specialized pharmaceutical manufacturing, rather than trying to replicate the full suite of services offered by the ISS.

The economic viability of these stations depends on finding customers outside of government agencies. Industries such as semiconductor manufacturing and biotechnology are particularly interested in the unique conditions of microgravity. In space, crystals can grow more perfectly and biological tissues can be printed in three dimensions without collapsing under their own weight. If these commercial outposts can lower the cost of access, they may trigger a new industrial revolution centered in low Earth orbit.

---

The Role of NASA and Government Support

NASA’s strategy has shifted in early 2026 to better align with the progress of the commercial sector. The agency has placed its firm‑fixed‑price contracts for station services on hold, choosing instead to continue supporting industry through Space Act Agreements. These agreements provide funding for specific design and demonstration milestones, allowing companies to prove their technology before the government commits to long‑term service contracts. This flexibility is intended to ensure that at least one, and ideally more, American‑led stations are operational before the ISS is deorbited.

The agency is also working to establish clear safety standards and certification processes for these private facilities. Since these stations will host government astronauts, they must meet rigorous requirements for life support, radiation shielding, and emergency evacuation. This regulatory framework is just as vital as the physical hardware, as it provides the legal and safety foundation for a sustainable orbital economy.

| Company | Primary Station Name | Target Launch | Key Strategy |

|---|---|---|---|

| Vast Space | Haven‑1 | Q1 2027 | Single‑module, speed‑to‑market demonstrator |

| Axiom Space | Axiom Station | 2026 (first module) | Incremental expansion attached to the ISS |

| Voyager Space | Starlab | 2029 | Single‑launch, integrated large‑scale habitat |

| Blue Origin | Orbital Reef | Late 2020s | Mixed‑use business park with inflatable modules |

---

Summary

The development of commercial space stations is no longer a matter of distant speculation but a rapidly maturing industry with flight hardware currently in assembly. Companies like Axiom Space and Vast Space are leading the way with near‑term launch schedules, while larger consortia like the Starlab and Orbital Reef teams are building the high‑capacity infrastructure of the future. While technical and financial risks remain, the momentum toward a privatized low‑Earth‑orbit appears irreversible. The success of these ventures will determine whether the post‑ISS era is one of continued human expansion or a temporary retreat from the orbital frontier.

---

Appendix: Top 10 Questions Answered in This Article

Which company is expected to launch the first commercial space station?

Vast Space is on track to launch Haven‑1 in Q1 2027.

How does Axiom Space’s approach differ from its competitors?

Axiom builds its station as an extension of the existing ISS rather than launching a standalone facility immediately, allowing use of the current station’s power and life‑support systems while it grows.

What is the purpose of the Starlab project?

Starlab aims to provide a high‑volume, single‑launch replacement for the ISS’s research capabilities, serving government and industrial clients.

What role does Northrop Grumman play in the current space‑station market?

After canceling its own independent station plans, Northrop Grumman joined the Starlab team, providing cargo‑resupply services with an upgraded Cygnus spacecraft.

What is the “business park” concept for space stations?

Pioneered by projects like Orbital Reef, the concept involves a station hosting multiple tenants—pharmaceutical companies, national space agencies, tourism providers, etc.—under one orbital platform.

How is NASA supporting these private companies?

Through the Commercial Low‑Earth‑Orbit Destinations program, NASA provides funding and technical expertise via Space Act Agreements tied to specific development milestones.

What are the main benefits of manufacturing in microgravity?

Microgravity enables production of materials that are difficult or impossible on Earth, such as perfect crystals and complex biological tissues, by eliminating gravity‑induced distortions.

What happens to the ISS once commercial stations are ready?

The ISS is scheduled to be deorbited and safely guided into the ocean around 2030, with NASA transitioning its operations to one or more new commercial platforms.

What is the significance of the Haven Demo mission?

The Haven Demo proved that Vast Space could successfully operate its own spacecraft in orbit, providing critical data and boosting investor confidence.

Are there any companies using inflatable technology for their stations?

Both Sierra Space and Max Space are developing inflatable habitat technology, which offers much larger living volumes than traditional metallic structures once expanded in orbit.

---

Appendix: Top 10 Frequently Searched Questions Answered in This Article

What is the status of the International Space Station retirement?

The ISS is slated for retirement in 2030, with NASA and its international partners working to ensure a smooth transition to private stations.

What is the difference between Haven‑1 and Haven‑2?

Haven‑1 is a small, single‑module station for short‑term missions and technology testing. Haven‑2 is a larger, modular system proposed as a long‑term successor to the ISS.

Who is building the Starlab space station?

Starlab is being built by a joint venture between Voyager Space and Airbus, with contributions from Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, MDA Space, and Northrop Grumman.

How much does it cost to build a private space station?

NASA has allocated between $1 billion and $1.5 billion for the second phase of its commercial destination program. Individual companies are raising hundreds of millions of dollars in private capital to supplement government funding.

What is the Orbital Reef space station?

Orbital Reef is a planned commercial space station led by Blue Origin and Sierra Space, designed as a multi‑purpose facility for research, industry, and tourism in low Earth orbit.

How do astronauts get to commercial space stations?

Commercial stations will rely on existing and upcoming crew‑transport systems such as SpaceX’s Dragon and Boeing’s Starliner. Some stations, like those launched by Blue Origin, may eventually use the New Glenn rocket for transport.

What are the benefits of commercial space stations over government ones?

Commercial stations are expected to be more cost‑effective because they serve a wide range of paying customers rather than a single government budget, driving innovation and lowering overall space‑access costs.

What is an inflatable space module?

An inflatable module is a habitat made of flexible, high‑strength fabrics that is launched compact and expanded in space, providing much larger habitable volumes than traditional rocket fairings allow.

Will there be a gap in space‑station availability?

NASA’s primary goal is to prevent a gap by having at least one commercial station operational before the ISS is retired. Current timelines from companies like Vast and Axiom suggest new outposts will be ready in time.

What is the Commercial Low‑Earth‑Orbit Destinations program?

It is a NASA initiative designed to stimulate the development of private space stations by providing early‑stage funding and technical support, enabling the agency to later rent services from these commercial platforms.