Pershing Square Challenge 2026 Runner-Ups on Baker Hughes $BKR

Yet Another Value Podcast
Yet Another Value PodcastMay 25, 2026

Why It Matters

Recognizing Baker Hughes’ shift toward long‑term energy‑technology growth could unlock significant alpha for investors as the market continues to undervalue its 2030‑plus infrastructure upside.

Key Takeaways

  • Team performed 30+ expert interviews, rivaling private‑equity diligence.
  • Chose Baker Hughes for its dual oil services and energy‑tech transition.
  • Emphasized underappreciated growth potential of Industrial Energy Technology segment.
  • Argue market undervalues 2030‑plus long‑term energy infrastructure upside.
  • Presentation praised for differentiated research, conference insights, and resilience.

Summary

The episode spotlights the runner‑up team from the Pershing Square Challenge, which built a deep‑dive investment thesis on Baker Hughes (BKR). The Columbia MBA students leveraged over thirty expert calls, conference visits and on‑the‑ground research—effort comparable to a private‑equity due‑diligence process—to justify their pick. Their core argument hinges on Baker Hughes’ unique dual‑business model: traditional oil‑field services paired with a rapidly expanding Industrial Energy Technology (IET) unit that converts natural gas to power. They see a structural shift toward electrification, data‑center demand and global energy‑infrastructure build‑out, positioning IET to become a 50/50 revenue driver by 2025 and a long‑term growth engine beyond 2030. The team highlighted vivid examples, from presenting photos at the Western Turbine Users Conference (even with a broken arm) to quantifying the IET segment’s rising contribution—from the high‑30s percent in 2020 to near parity today. They argue the market still prices Baker Hughes as a cyclical oil play, overlooking the magnitude and durability of its energy‑tech transformation, and thus leaves an alpha‑rich opportunity. If investors internalize this thesis, Baker Hughes could be viewed not merely as a commodity‑linked service provider but as a strategic player in the global energy transition, offering a risk‑adjusted upside that many analysts have yet to fully price in.

Original Description

Team Baker Hughes, the second-place finishers in the 2026 Pershing Square Challenge, discuss their Baker Hughes thesis and why they believe the market hasn't fully appreciated the company's evolution from a cyclical oil field services business. They discuss how the long runway for the IET business, and they back their thesis up with 30+ expert calls, a trip to the Western Turbine Users conference, and a sum-of-the-parts case that leans on growth, not multiple expansion.
This episode is sponsored by Trata. Check them out at https://www.trata.com.
Chapters:
0:00 Intro and sponsor
2:21 Meet Team Baker Hughes
4:39 Why they backed into Baker Hughes
6:56 Watching the stock run from $45 to $65 mid-pitch
7:21 The differentiated work: 30+ expert calls and the turbine conference
8:27 The two businesses: oil field services vs. industrial energy technology
10:10 What the market is missing on the IET transformation
12:56 Is this just another cycle? The chart hit $65 three times
13:59 Why this gas turbine cycle is structurally different
17:01 AI as a distraction: onshoring and electrification
17:51 The installed base flywheel and recurring service revenue
21:13 The three turbine segments and the supply chain squeeze
23:34 Honoring 70-year customers vs. mercenary pricing
27:44 Valuation: a sum-of-the-parts story, not a multiple story
29:36 The Chart acquisition: can they really double their money?
34:56 The GE merger history and the GE Aero Alliance today
38:27 Management, alignment, and insider ownership
42:41 The C3 AI anecdote and wrap-up
Links:
Yet Another Value Blog - https://www.yetanothervalueblog.com
Production and editing by The Podcast Consultant - https://thepodcastconsultant.com/

Comments

Want to join the conversation?

Loading comments...