This Perfect Stock Is Down 50%

Joseph Carlson After Hours
Joseph Carlson After HoursMar 25, 2026

Why It Matters

FICO’s steep price decline amid monopoly allegations creates a high‑risk, high‑reward scenario for investors, while its entrenched market position could dictate broader credit‑scoring industry dynamics.

Key Takeaways

  • FICO stock fell over 50% from $2,400 to $1,000.
  • Competition from VantageScore and regulatory scrutiny threaten pricing power.
  • Senator Hawley alleges monopoly pricing, prompting antitrust investigation.
  • Dev Cantasaria’s thesis highlights FICO’s high margins, operating leverage, low capex.
  • Valley Forge Capital still holds 30% of its fund in FICO.

Summary

The video centers on Fair Isaac Corp. (FICO), a credit‑scoring giant whose shares have slumped more than 50% from roughly $2,400 a year ago to about $1,000 today. The presenter questions whether the steep decline represents a buying opportunity or a warning sign, especially given the stock’s recent 37% year‑to‑date loss and heightened political attention.

Key data points include FICO’s historically dominant market position—used by 90% of lenders—and its impressive financials: an 88% operating margin, near‑zero capital expenditures, and growing free cash flow. However, competition from VantageScore, erosion of government‑mandated exclusivity, and a Senate antitrust probe led by Sen. Josh Hawley are eroding investor confidence. Hawley’s testimony accuses FICO of exploiting monopoly power to inflate mortgage‑closing fees, citing a 100% five‑year price growth in its scoring product.

The video cites Dev Cantasaria of Valley Forge Capital, who still allocates roughly 30% of a $4.4 billion fund to FICO despite the headwinds. Cantasaria’s original thesis praises FICO’s “perfect business model”—high margins, operating leverage, non‑dilutive share buybacks, and a network‑effect moat that makes the score a de‑facto industry language. He argues that the moat lies less in predictive accuracy (which has plateaued) and more in entrenched brand and regulatory legacy.

If the antitrust scrutiny leads to pricing reforms or new entrants gain traction, FICO’s cash‑generating engine could be compromised, making the current discount a risk‑adjusted entry point for growth‑oriented investors. Conversely, the firm’s financial resilience and deep‑seated market integration suggest that, absent regulatory disruption, the stock may rebound, rewarding those who maintain exposure.

Original Description

Join Qualtrim, the stock analysis platform I built and use, and join over 13,000 other paying members: https://www.qualtrim.com/
00:00 Overview
02:00 The Fall of FICO
31:09 Meta $9 Trillion Market Cap Goal
32:50 Fail Of The Week: Robots
-Disclaimer
Some of the links below are affiliate links, I can earn money from them at no cost to you.
This content is not a solicitation, is not endorsed by M1, and was not reviewed by M1; the opinions expressed are solely those of the authors and do not reflect M1's views. Information presented is accurate as of the video posting date; for the most up-to-date information, please refer to m1.com. Before making any investment decisions, consult your personal investment, legal, and tax advisors, as this content is for informational purposes only and not intended as investment recommendations.
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
📚 My favorite Investing Books: https://amzn.to/3KwyIhG
SOCIAL MEDIA
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
🐦 I post random thoughts on Twitter too: https://twitter.com/joecarlsonshow
DISCLAIMER
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
I am not a professional investor and have never claimed to be. I'm an amateur investor sharing my experience of what I've learned, where I have had success, and where I've had failures. I share my thoughts on investing and performance with transparency. My approach and goal to investing is to buy high-quality long-term investments in world-class businesses that I call "compounders". I view my investments as businesses, not as stocks. Before creating content on YouTube full time I worked as a senior-level programmer for 8 years. Over the years as a programmer, I compounded my knowledge of development. I take the same iterative learning approach to my study of investing. I study investing as a craft in the continual pursuit of being better. I will make mistakes in investment decisions from time to time. Results are not guaranteed. Please do not blindly follow me into any investments, and make sure your portfolio and investments are built around your specific income, risk tolerance, personality, timeline, and overall circumstances.

Comments

Want to join the conversation?

Loading comments...