Don’t Trust Your Accountant
Why It Matters
Business owners who assume their accountant bears all risk face costly penalties and prolonged audits; understanding the reliance test protects their bottom line.
Key Takeaways
- •IRS holds taxpayer accountable, not just the accountant
- •Reliance defense requires qualified advisor, accurate info, good‑faith reliance
- •Basic filing deadlines are non‑delegable duties you cannot outsource
- •Review returns before signing to catch errors or fraud
- •Proper advisor selection can mitigate penalties, but not tax liability
Summary
The video debunks the common belief that hiring an accountant shields a taxpayer from IRS liability. Jasmine Dilucci, a tax attorney and CPA, explains that the IRS audits the return signer, not the preparer, and that blaming the accountant offers no legal protection.
She outlines the legal framework: basic filing deadlines are non‑delegable duties, while substantive tax advice may qualify for a reliance defense. The Tax Court’s three‑part test—competent advisor, accurate information, and good‑faith reliance—must be satisfied for penalties to be waived.
Dilucci cites United States v. Boyle, where a court rejected reliance on an attorney for missed deadlines, and Neonatology Associates v. Commissioner, which set the reliance criteria. She also references the Murens case, where an accountant’s fraud led to decades‑long audits and massive penalties.
The takeaway for businesses is clear: select a licensed, experienced professional, provide complete data, and review the return before signing. Proper reliance can reduce penalties, but the taxpayer remains responsible for the tax itself.
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...