Billionaire Tax Works: No Exodus, Funds School Lunches
I am in support of the Billionaire Tax. Because taxing people living in a State that provided them the workers, STATE TAXES from Californians, etc, who are billionaires, is simply the right, moral, and fair thing to do. Also - taxing billionaires a one-time tax on wealth - as I understand it - means they pay X billion dollars that they'll then make up on the stock market in a few months. Maybe they'll have to hock one of fifteen yachts. But people like Brin are saying if this tax is enacted, all the billionaires will flee and take their companies with them. In Massachusetts, they had a millionaire tax along the same lines. Guess what happened? The millionaires didn't move, and guess what they did with the money coming from taxes? They paid for school lunches: https://lnkd.in/eSxeH6bv ***** Here's a few quotes from an article talking about how Sergey Brin is fighting the Billionaire Tax - wait for it - by paying workers $15 for each signature they collect in opposition to the Billionaire Tax. It's challenging to try to work for "Responsible technology" and fight for things like children's rights, data agency, environmental rights, re: hyperscale data centers and then read about this level of mendacious, puerile greed. So for fun, the next time you're talking about, "Responsible AI" make sure to talk about supporting the Billionaire Tax and Tax law in general (to keep the same people from using off short tax havens to avoid paying taxes at all). Or just say, "I support the Billionaire Tax." And, Sergei - just write the check on the money you owe the people of California. They're the reason Google was able to exist. https://lnkd.in/ehZnqrCX Campaigns in California are now paying workers $15 for each signature they collect in opposition to the billionaire tax, and the effort has some serious money behind it. Google co-founder Sergey Brin and other local magnates have created a new political group to combat the wealth tax, called Building a Better California. The new attempt, reports The Guardian, follows a recent proposed initiative, the 2026 Billionaire Tax Act. If passed, it would impose a one-time 5 percent tax on the net worth of individuals worth over $1 billion, with revenue going toward health care and education. The new ballot initiative is sponsored by the Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West. According to SEIU-UHW, roughly 200 people in California are identifiable billionaires, holding a combined wealth of $2 trillion. Now, wealthy opponents are funding a counterinitiative to weaken the billionaire tax. But it will be up to California voters, who will get to decide on the upcoming measures during the upcoming general election in November 2026.
Emily Bender’s Reviews Reveal Authentic AI, Not Techbro Hype
Thanks to Emily M. Bender for these reviews that deeply resonate and provide a reason to see Ghost in the Machine and not the techbro PR.
GenAI’s Mirage Reasoning Masks False Medical Breakthroughs
“Mirage reasoning” is a helpful term but I’d go a step further - nonsensical misdirection. Please note for all those “medical breakthroughs” from GenAI those don’t count unless the breakthrough is in mendacious harmful design. This is GenAI.
GenAI Isn’t the only AI—Many Low‑compute Alternatives Exist
*Must watch. If you work in any field relating to Artificial Intelligence (any application), or AI Ethics, OR economics OR sustainability, OR "responsible AI / Tech" or "AI for Good" etc, I cannot recommend enough you watch this conversation. A...
Seeking Chief AGI Economist Role with Google DeepMind
Anyone know of anyone else hiring a "Chief AGI Economist" along with Google DeepMind? I'm doing research in this area. Thanks in advance. https://lnkd.in/eEQbSSxK
AGI Hype Masks Undefined Goals, Urging Corporate Accountability
The "race to AGI" is framed as positive for society, or at least the people talking about their society or government. This framing or narrative implies the following: - There is a globally accepted definition of AGI (there isn't). -...
AGI Remains Speculative; New Paper Defines Yet Debated Framework
AGI is speculation. As it hasn't arrived yet. I've found people get offended when I note this reality, but am not framing 'speculation' as 'evil' or 'wrong' per se. It's just not here yet. A key paper titled, "A Definition...
GenAI Is Here—Simple, Powerful, and Impressive
This is GenAI. Nice.
Backing AGI‑focused GenAI Endors
If you use GenAI systems whose founders proceed their vision as reaching AGI, then you support the logic that AGI is real or will be and the most beneficial solution for society. When as an ideology it is ill defined,...
Demanding Concrete Plans for AGI, Not Speculation
What happens when AGI arrives? I’m asking. Please provide specifics. And please explain why a speculative ideology society is supposed to wait for now is any type of genuine plan. Thanks in advance. And please no GenAI use for responses.
DeepMind's AGI Economics Role Challenges Traditional Growth Paradigms
To all my Economics / Wellbeing / Happiness / Flourishing expert friends, what are your thoughts on GoogleDeep Mind's search for a "Director, AGI Economics?" This is from the Job Application: "Artificial Intelligence could be one of humanity’s most useful...
Beyond Generative AI: Core Principles for Ethical AI
Disclosures (as a means of building trust / clarity before you read): No GenAI was used in the creation (writing or research) of this article. This article is Human Authored as framed by The Authors Guild (I'm a member). While...
GenAI Trustworthiness Takes Another Hit
Yet one more nail in ye olde coffin for GenAI "trustworthiness" in general.
Disclosing AI Use Builds Trust, Not Just Prompt Credit
(The following was written entirely by me, John C. Havens. No GenAI involved). In the last month I've been reading more and more posts on various platforms, emails, and texts where a person discloses they've been using GenAI (typically ChatGPT...
Anthropic Pledges $20M to US AI‑regulation Advocates
Yes.
