
On 15 November 2023 the UK Supreme Court handed down a landmark judgment ([2023] UKSC 42) consolidating six separate appeals by asylum seekers from Syria, Vietnam, Iran, Sudan and Iraq against the Home Secretary. The Court ruled that the Home Office must conduct a fully individualized assessment of each claim, applying a clarified risk‑of‑return test consistent with the European Convention on Human Rights. The judgment rejected the blanket application of the Home Office’s ‘safe‑country’ and ‘fast‑track’ procedures in these cases. The decision sets a new procedural benchmark for future asylum determinations in the UK.

On 11 October 2023 the UK Supreme Court heard six related asylum appeals involving nationals from Syria, Vietnam, Iran, Sudan and Iraq, and delivered a unified judgment on 15 November 2023 (neutral citation [2023] UKSC 42). The cases—R (AAA (Syria) et al.) v Secretary of State, R (HTN (Vietnam)) v Secretary...

On 15 November 2023 the UK Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment (neutral citation [2023] UKSC 42) covering six separate appeals by asylum seekers from Syria, Vietnam, Iran, Sudan and Iraq against the Home Secretary’s refusal decisions. The Court examined the scope of...

On 10 October 2023 the UK Supreme Court heard a cluster of judicial‑review applications from asylum seekers originating in Syria, Vietnam, Iran, Sudan and Iraq, all challenging decisions by the Home Secretary to refuse entry or deportation. The Court delivered its judgment...

On 9 October 2023 the UK Supreme Court heard a series of appeals from asylum seekers originating in Syria, Vietnam, Iran, Sudan and Iraq, challenging refusals by the Home Secretary. The Court delivered its judgment on 15 November 2023 (neutral citation [2023] UKSC 42), ruling that the...

On 15 November 2023 the UK Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment (neutral citation [2023] UKSC 42) covering six separate appeals filed by asylum seekers from Syria, Vietnam, Iran, Sudan and Iraq. The cases, heard on 9 October 2023, challenged Home Office decisions on...

The UK Supreme Court delivered its judgment on Stephen Hilland’s application for judicial review in Northern Ireland on 7 February 2024 (neutral citation [2024] UKSC 4). The appeal challenged a public‑body decision, arguing that the authority had acted beyond its statutory powers and failed to...

The UK Supreme Court heard Stephen Hilland’s application for judicial review of a Northern Ireland decision on 4 October 2023 and delivered its judgment on 7 February 2024 (neutral citation [2024] UKSC 4). The Court examined whether the public authority had acted within its statutory powers and...

The UK Supreme Court issued its judgment on 17 January 2024 in Herculito Maritime Ltd and others v Gunvor International BV and others (UKSC 2022/0009). The dispute centered on the interpretation of a notice‑of‑readiness clause in a time‑charter and the resulting demurrage liability....

The UK Supreme Court delivered its judgment in Herculito Maritime Ltd and others v Gunvor International BV and others ([2024] UKSC 2), confirming that a broad limitation‑of‑liability clause in a time‑charter agreement is enforceable. The Court clarified that such clauses...

The hearing centered on the interpretation of UK anti‑avoidance provisions—sections 739, 740, 744 and related case law—in the Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs v Fisher litigation. The court examined how transfers of assets to non‑resident entities trigger tax liability...

In a procedural hearing in Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs v Fisher, the court pressed HMRC to produce a detailed table showing the additional income tax it seeks from each taxpayer for each year linked to profits of SJG,...

The hearing in Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs v Fisher centered on whether the February 2000 transfer of a tele‑betting business from SJA to SJG was driven by a genuine need to comply with Section 9 of the Betting, Gaming...

The hearing in Byers and others v Saudi National Bank centered on whether the respondents could be held liable for knowing receipt of trust assets. Counsel argued that the core issue is the existence of a continuing equitable interest in...
![CCC (by Her Mother and Litigation Friend MMM) v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust [2026] UKSC 5](/cdn-cgi/image/width=1200,quality=75,format=auto,fit=cover/https://i.ytimg.com/vi/7GSfybLmh1o/maxresdefault.jpg)
The Supreme Court heard CCC (by her mother and litigation friend MMM) v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, focusing on whether a child who suffers a life‑shortening injury can claim lost‑years damages for earnings and pension that she would have...

The Privy Council hearing of Sassy Garcia v Arima Door Centre Holding Company Ltd opened with a tribute to the late Robin Lloyds, a veteran Caribbean privy‑council solicitor, before moving to the substantive appeal concerning a landlord‑tenant dispute. The appellant argued...

The hearing examined how Saint Lucia’s Land Registration Act and the Land Adjudication Act interact when a squatter or a paper‑title holder seeks ownership. Central to the debate were sections 16, 161A, 161D and 15, which govern long‑term possession, provisional title and the adjudication...

The hearing concerns an appeal before the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court challenging a 2022 Court of Appeal decision in Saint Lucia. The dispute centers on the interaction between the island’s land‑registration system and prescriptive rights that qualify as overriding interests...

The UK Court of Appeal examined a trademark dispute between Target Partners GmbH, the proprietor of the domain names targetventures.com and targetventures.de, and Target Ventures Group, a BVI‑registered venture capital fund that began using the “Target Ventures” sign in the...

The hearing between SkyKick UK Ltd and Sky Ltd centered on a long‑running dispute over trademark registration practice, specifically whether the lack of an intent‑to‑use requirement and overly broad specifications constitute bad‑faith filing. The counsel highlighted two pivotal developments: the...

The hearing centered on SkyKick UK Ltd’s challenge to Sky Ltd’s trademark registration, focusing on whether the mark was obtained in bad faith under both European Union and United Kingdom law. Judges scrutinized the applicable legal framework, especially in light...

The hearing between SkyKick UK Ltd and Sky Ltd centered on the proper purpose of trademark registration, questioning whether marks can be obtained merely as defensive tools or must genuinely indicate the origin of goods and services. The judge highlighted...

The hearing centered on Stanford Asset Holdings Ltd’s appeal against AfrAsia Bank Ltd, probing whether Mauritian courts may compel disclosure of confidential banking documents under section 643H of the Banking Act. The appellant argued that the judging chambers possess jurisdiction...

The Mauritian Supreme Court heard an appeal by Stanford Asset Holdings Ltd and another party against AfrAsia Bank Ltd, seeking a freestanding Norwich Pharmac equitable remedy to obtain confidential banking information held by the Financial Services Commission. The appellants argue...

The Lords heard arguments in Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs v Professional Game Match Officials Ltd, concentrating on whether the referees were employees for tax and social‑security purposes. Central to the dispute was the First‑Tier Tribunal’s application of the...

The hearing between HM Revenue & Customs and Professional Game Match Officials Ltd centered on whether the match officials were employees for tax and employment‑rights purposes. Counsel argued that the crux lay in the mutuality of obligation test, invoking...