
John Mussington and Another v Development Control Authority and Others (Antigua and Barbuda)
In a court hearing over the Barbudan airport, counsel reported that a 2012 Sustainable Island Resource Management and Zoning Plan—developed with UN involvement—exists but its status under the 2003 Planning Act (section 9) is unclear. The discussion focused on procedural defects: whether statutory notice requirements under section 22/221 and consultation obligations under section 223 were met, and whether village council discussion of an economic project (including the airport) amounted to lawful public notice. Government counsel could not identify the current operative planning permission—acknowledging an initial unconditional approval was later converted to conditional approval—but could not produce the conditions on the record and agreed to file them. The airport is already constructed, which raises the prospect that a successful judicial finding of illegality would force the government to reapply for permission rather than undo completed works.

John Mussington and Another v Development Control Authority and Others (Antigua and Barbuda)
The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) delivered its judgment in John Mussington and another v Development Control Authority and others on 27 February 2024, concerning a dispute over planning permissions in Antigua and Barbuda. The appellants challenged the...

Jersey Choice Ltd v HM Treasury
The UK Supreme Court dismissed Jersey Choice Ltd’s challenge to HM Treasury’s decision that the company does not qualify for the offshore‑fund tax exemption under the Finance Act 2020. The Court held that the statutory definition of a “qualifying offshore...

Jersey Choice Ltd v HM Treasury
The UK Supreme Court ruled in Jersey Choice Ltd v HM Treasury that the company did not meet the UK corporate tax residency criteria, despite receiving UK‑sourced income. The Court focused on the location of central management and control, concluding...

Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department
The UK Supreme Court delivered its judgment in Mueen‑Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department on 20 June 2024 ([2024] UKSC 21). The Court held that the Home Secretary’s power to refuse a visa on "public interest" grounds must be exercised proportionately...

R (AAA (Syria) and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
On 15 November 2023 the UK Supreme Court handed down a landmark judgment ([2023] UKSC 42) consolidating six separate appeals by asylum seekers from Syria, Vietnam, Iran, Sudan and Iraq against the Home Secretary. The Court ruled that the Home...

R (AAA (Syria) and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
On 11 October 2023 the UK Supreme Court heard six related asylum appeals involving nationals from Syria, Vietnam, Iran, Sudan and Iraq, and delivered a unified judgment on 15 November 2023 (neutral citation [2023] UKSC 42). The cases—R (AAA (Syria) et al.) v Secretary of State, R (HTN (Vietnam)) v Secretary...

R (AAA (Syria) and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
On 15 November 2023 the UK Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment (neutral citation [2023] UKSC 42) covering six separate appeals by asylum seekers from Syria, Vietnam, Iran, Sudan and Iraq against the Home Secretary’s refusal decisions. The Court examined the scope of...

R (AAA (Syria) and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
On 10 October 2023 the UK Supreme Court heard a cluster of judicial‑review applications from asylum seekers originating in Syria, Vietnam, Iran, Sudan and Iraq, all challenging decisions by the Home Secretary to refuse entry or deportation. The Court delivered its judgment...

R (AAA (Syria) and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
On 9 October 2023 the UK Supreme Court heard a series of appeals from asylum seekers originating in Syria, Vietnam, Iran, Sudan and Iraq, challenging refusals by the Home Secretary. The Court delivered its judgment on 15 November 2023 (neutral citation [2023] UKSC 42), ruling that the...

R (AAA (Syria) and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
On 15 November 2023 the UK Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment (neutral citation [2023] UKSC 42) covering six separate appeals filed by asylum seekers from Syria, Vietnam, Iran, Sudan and Iraq. The cases, heard on 9 October 2023, challenged Home Office decisions on...

In the Matter of an Application by Stephen Hilland for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland)
The UK Supreme Court delivered its judgment on Stephen Hilland’s application for judicial review in Northern Ireland on 7 February 2024 (neutral citation [2024] UKSC 4). The appeal challenged a public‑body decision, arguing that the authority had acted beyond its statutory powers and failed to...

In the Matter of an Application by Stephen Hilland for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland)
The UK Supreme Court heard Stephen Hilland’s application for judicial review of a Northern Ireland decision on 4 October 2023 and delivered its judgment on 7 February 2024 (neutral citation [2024] UKSC 4). The Court examined whether the public authority had acted within its statutory powers and...

Herculito Maritime Ltd and Others v Gunvor International BV and Others
The UK Supreme Court issued its judgment on 17 January 2024 in Herculito Maritime Ltd and others v Gunvor International BV and others (UKSC 2022/0009). The dispute centered on the interpretation of a notice‑of‑readiness clause in a time‑charter and the resulting demurrage liability....

Herculito Maritime Ltd and Others v Gunvor International BV and Others
The UK Supreme Court delivered its judgment in Herculito Maritime Ltd and others v Gunvor International BV and others ([2024] UKSC 2), confirming that a broad limitation‑of‑liability clause in a time‑charter agreement is enforceable. The Court clarified that such clauses...

Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs v Fisher and Another; HMRC v Fisher (No 2)
The hearing centered on the interpretation of UK anti‑avoidance provisions—sections 739, 740, 744 and related case law—in the Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs v Fisher litigation. The court examined how transfers of assets to non‑resident entities trigger tax liability...

Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs v Fisher and Another; HMRC v Fisher (No 2)
In a procedural hearing in Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs v Fisher, the court pressed HMRC to produce a detailed table showing the additional income tax it seeks from each taxpayer for each year linked to profits of SJG,...

Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs v Fisher and Another; HMRC v Fisher (No 2)
The hearing in Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs v Fisher centered on whether the February 2000 transfer of a tele‑betting business from SJA to SJG was driven by a genuine need to comply with Section 9 of the Betting, Gaming...

Byers and Others v Saudi National Bank
The hearing in Byers and others v Saudi National Bank centered on whether the respondents could be held liable for knowing receipt of trust assets. Counsel argued that the core issue is the existence of a continuing equitable interest in...
![CCC (by Her Mother and Litigation Friend MMM) v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust [2026] UKSC 5](/cdn-cgi/image/width=1200,quality=75,format=auto,fit=cover/https://i.ytimg.com/vi/7GSfybLmh1o/maxresdefault.jpg)
CCC (by Her Mother and Litigation Friend MMM) v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust [2026] UKSC 5
The Supreme Court heard CCC (by her mother and litigation friend MMM) v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, focusing on whether a child who suffers a life‑shortening injury can claim lost‑years damages for earnings and pension that she would have...

Sassy Garcia v Arima Door Centre Holding Company Ltd (Trinidad and Tobago)
The Privy Council hearing of Sassy Garcia v Arima Door Centre Holding Company Ltd opened with a tribute to the late Robin Lloyds, a veteran Caribbean privy‑council solicitor, before moving to the substantive appeal concerning a landlord‑tenant dispute. The appellant argued...

Francis Chitolie and Another v Saint Lucia National Housing Corporation (Saint Lucia)
The hearing examined how Saint Lucia’s Land Registration Act and the Land Adjudication Act interact when a squatter or a paper‑title holder seeks ownership. Central to the debate were sections 16, 161A, 161D and 15, which govern long‑term possession, provisional title and the adjudication...

Francis Chitolie and Another v Saint Lucia National Housing Corporation (Saint Lucia)
The hearing concerns an appeal before the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court challenging a 2022 Court of Appeal decision in Saint Lucia. The dispute centers on the interaction between the island’s land‑registration system and prescriptive rights that qualify as overriding interests...

SkyKick UK Ltd and Another v Sky Ltd and Others
The UK Court of Appeal examined a trademark dispute between Target Partners GmbH, the proprietor of the domain names targetventures.com and targetventures.de, and Target Ventures Group, a BVI‑registered venture capital fund that began using the “Target Ventures” sign in the...

SkyKick UK Ltd and Another v Sky Ltd and Others
The hearing between SkyKick UK Ltd and Sky Ltd centered on a long‑running dispute over trademark registration practice, specifically whether the lack of an intent‑to‑use requirement and overly broad specifications constitute bad‑faith filing. The counsel highlighted two pivotal developments: the...

SkyKick UK Ltd and Another v Sky Ltd and Others
The hearing centered on SkyKick UK Ltd’s challenge to Sky Ltd’s trademark registration, focusing on whether the mark was obtained in bad faith under both European Union and United Kingdom law. Judges scrutinized the applicable legal framework, especially in light...

SkyKick UK Ltd and Another v Sky Ltd and Others
The hearing between SkyKick UK Ltd and Sky Ltd centered on the proper purpose of trademark registration, questioning whether marks can be obtained merely as defensive tools or must genuinely indicate the origin of goods and services. The judge highlighted...

Stanford Asset Holdings Ltd and Another v AfrAsia Bank Ltd (Mauritius)
The hearing centered on Stanford Asset Holdings Ltd’s appeal against AfrAsia Bank Ltd, probing whether Mauritian courts may compel disclosure of confidential banking documents under section 643H of the Banking Act. The appellant argued that the judging chambers possess jurisdiction...

Stanford Asset Holdings Ltd and Another v AfrAsia Bank Ltd (Mauritius)
The Mauritian Supreme Court heard an appeal by Stanford Asset Holdings Ltd and another party against AfrAsia Bank Ltd, seeking a freestanding Norwich Pharmac equitable remedy to obtain confidential banking information held by the Financial Services Commission. The appellants argue...

Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs v Professional Game Match Officials Ltd
The Lords heard arguments in Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs v Professional Game Match Officials Ltd, concentrating on whether the referees were employees for tax and social‑security purposes. Central to the dispute was the First‑Tier Tribunal’s application of the...

Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs v Professional Game Match Officials Ltd
The hearing between HM Revenue & Customs and Professional Game Match Officials Ltd centered on whether the match officials were employees for tax and employment‑rights purposes. Counsel argued that the crux lay in the mutuality of obligation test, invoking...