Addressing the 57% Blind Spot: Kaspersky Reports on the Aspects of SOC Effectiveness to Consider

Why It Matters

Without accurate detection coverage, SOCs risk missing critical attacks, inflating false‑positive rates and eroding security ROI. External assessments help organizations close hidden gaps and align monitoring with evolving threat landscapes.

Key Takeaways

• Only 43% of ingested data is covered by active detection rules
• High‑volume SOCs monitor just ~30% of sources in real time
• 50% of SOCs depend on vendor rule sets, leading to blind spots
• External SOC consulting projects grew to 23% of engagements in 2025

Pulse Analysis

The Kaspersky report highlights a systemic issue: enterprises pour massive volumes of telemetry into SIEMs and EDR platforms, yet less than half of that data is actively correlated for threat detection. This mismatch creates a false sense of security, as organizations often base performance on speed metrics—MTTD and MTTR—while ignoring coverage depth. When detection logic lags behind data ingestion, attackers can exploit unmonitored vectors, especially in network, database and web‑server layers that traditionally receive the least attention.

Scaling detection engineering is a core challenge. About half of surveyed SOCs rely on vendor‑supplied rule sets, which can generate high false‑positive rates and miss nuanced, cross‑source attacks. The remaining teams that build rules in‑house face resource constraints that stall rule development, leaving newly onboarded data sources idle. As infrastructure expands, the disparity between data volume and rule coverage widens, turning detection gaps into a predictable blind spot for even mature security programs.

The market response is a surge in specialized SOC consulting services. Kaspersky notes that in 2025, over a fifth of its consulting engagements focused on technical assessments and framework development, reflecting a growing appetite for independent validation of detection efficacy. External consultants bring a fresh perspective, simulate attacks, and establish repeatable detection‑engineering processes that continuously refine rule coverage. For enterprises, partnering with such experts can transform a reactive SOC into a proactive threat‑hunting engine, ultimately reducing breach risk and improving security ROI.