"That Was a Weird Conversation"

The Art of Asking Questions

"That Was a Weird Conversation"

The Art of Asking QuestionsJun 10, 2026

Why It Matters

Clear feedback is essential for employee development, retention, and organizational health, especially as remote and hybrid work increase communication challenges. Understanding and applying feed‑forward helps leaders foster trust, avoid costly misunderstandings, and improve performance outcomes, making the episode timely for anyone managing teams or client relationships.

Key Takeaways

  • Managers avoid specifics, causing employee confusion.
  • "Clear is kind; unclear is unkind" emphasizes clarity.
  • Feedforward focuses on future behavior, reducing defensiveness.
  • Avoidance patterns: preemptive pivot, vague timing, group deflection.
  • Poor feedback harms employee growth and manager development.

Pulse Analysis

In the episode, Andrea and Jen expose a common pitfall in performance conversations: managers often sidestep the concrete incident that triggered the feedback. They describe how good‑intentions to protect relationships can backfire, leaving employees puzzled about what actually needs improvement. This lack of clarity not only erodes trust but also deprives staff of actionable information, increasing the risk of mis‑interpretation and stalled development. By framing vague, future‑oriented suggestions as “kind,” leaders unintentionally create an unkind environment where accountability disappears.

The hosts then introduce “feedforward,” a technique coined by Marshall Goldsmith that flips the feedback script from past judgment to future possibility. Instead of assigning blame, managers ask for suggestions on how the employee could handle similar situations differently next time, listening without defending. This approach lowers defensiveness because the behavior in question has not yet occurred, making it editable. Feedforward works well in coaching and one‑on‑one settings, fostering collaboration rather than correction. However, the duo warns that over‑reliance on future‑only language can strip away essential accountability, especially when a clear performance issue demands direct address.

Finally, Andrea and Jen map four avoidance patterns that sabotage clarity: the preemptive pivot, where managers start with generic frames; vague timing, which obscures the specific incident; implicit suggestions that only make sense if the employee already knows the event; and group deflection, broadcasting personal feedback to a team. Each pattern forces listeners into detective work, fuels resentment, and can derail careers through missed improvement opportunities or unnecessary performance‑improvement plans. The speakers recommend naming the behavior, delivering concise feedforward, and reserving private conversations for sensitive issues. By doing so, leaders preserve trust while maintaining accountability, turning difficult talks into growth opportunities.

Episode Description

What happens when managers use future-focused feedback to dodge the thing that actually happened

Show Notes

Comments

Want to join the conversation?

Loading comments...