
In a 2025 ruling, Shanghai Huangpu District People’s Court held that English‑language prompts fed into Midjourney are not eligible for copyright protection. The court found the six prompt sets to be unordered lists of common artistic terms lacking original expression, classifying them as unprotectable ideas. It also noted that the plaintiff failed to prove control over the infringing account. The decision highlights policy worries that extending copyright to short prompts could limit language use and hinder AI innovation.

The European Commission unveiled new guidelines on the EU Foreign Subsidies Regulation, defining presumptions for targeted subsidies, a balancing test, and a prior‑notification regime for below‑threshold deals. In parallel, it levied hefty penalties: €72 million on automotive starter‑battery makers for a...