Inaugural Abell-Hodgson Open Lecture on Regenerative Agri-Food Systems
Why It Matters
Understanding and reshaping the economic and educational foundations of agri‑food systems is essential for mitigating climate, biodiversity, and equity crises, directly influencing future profitability and societal resilience.
Key Takeaways
- •Polycrisis links climate, biodiversity loss, and social inequity.
- •Top 1% income drives majority of emissions and overshoot.
- •Land‑use change and intensification release carbon, worsen climate.
- •Business school curricula reinforce practices fueling the polycrisis.
- •Regenerative agri‑food systems proposed as counter‑intuitive solution.
Summary
The inaugural Abell‑Hodgson Open Lecture framed regenerative agri‑food systems as a response to a looming polycrisis—simultaneous climate change, biodiversity collapse, and entrenched social inequity. The speaker, an engineer‑economist with personal ties to food safety, opened by mapping the audience’s diversity and acknowledging Indigenous territories, then set out a three‑part structure: diagnosing the problem, critiquing business‑school teachings, and offering hopeful solutions. Data highlighted accelerating global warming, with recent studies showing temperature spikes unprecedented in 450 million years and a social cost of carbon now exceeding $200 per ton—projected to rise tenfold. Biodiversity surveys revealed a 69 % average decline in species populations over 50 years, translating into $10‑20 trillion annual ecosystem service losses. Inequity metrics showed the top 1 % of earners responsible for 31‑67 % of ecological overshoot while bearing the fewest adaptation costs, exemplified by Hurricane Harvey’s disproportionate impact on low‑income neighborhoods. Personal anecdotes—such as the speaker’s grandmother’s death from BSE—and references to First Nations regenerative knowledge underscored the human dimension. The lecture also featured local farmers who shared practical regenerative practices, and cited the stark contrast between high‑income consumption patterns and low pro‑social behavior, reinforcing the systemic nature of the crisis. The overarching implication is clear: traditional business education perpetuates the very mechanisms driving the polycrisis. To avert escalating climate and biodiversity costs, institutions must embed regenerative agri‑food principles, redesign supply chains, and prioritize equity‑focused policies. Stakeholders across academia, finance, government, and farming are urged to co‑create solutions that expand, rather than merely slice, the global welfare pie.
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...