Let’s Talk Money | How To Choose The Hybrid SIF? | N18V | CNBC TV18
Why It Matters
These operational and regulatory differences materially affect risk-return profiles—investors must choose among SIFs based on exposure, leverage and strategy rather than category label, and compare them with higher-leverage AIFs and more constrained mutual funds. Confidence in stated returns and manager execution will drive flows as these new hybrids gain scale.
Summary
Asset managers are marketing distinct hybrid SIF (systematic investment fund) brands—Altiva (Edelweiss), Magnum (SBI), ICIF (ICICI Prudential), Q SIF (Quant), and others—that fall under the same long-short hybrid category but operate very differently. Altiva, the largest, combines 10–20% open equity via special situations, covered calls and permitted naked shorts up to 25%, yielding a stated return band of about 9–11%; by contrast, Bandhan’s Arudha behaves like an arbitrage-income product targeting roughly 7–8%. SIFs can run gross exposure of roughly 110–115% on capital (far lower than AIFs’ ~200% potential) and use derivatives more flexibly than mutual funds. Regulators require a minimum 25% equity and 25% debt allocation for the hybrid SIF category, limiting extreme leverage and shaping strategy design.
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...