Earnout Burnout- Drafting Earnout Agreements to Minimize Disputes Following the Sale of Private Companies

Earnout Burnout- Drafting Earnout Agreements to Minimize Disputes Following the Sale of Private Companies

National Law Review – Employment Law
National Law Review – Employment LawMar 16, 2026

Why It Matters

Well‑drafted earnouts protect both buyers and sellers from costly litigation and preserve deal value, making them critical for successful private‑company transactions.

Key Takeaways

  • Revenue metrics reduce earnout disputes
  • Define accounting practices explicitly
  • Retain CPA for drafting
  • Attach detailed financial models
  • Include referee and arbitration provisions

Pulse Analysis

Earnouts have become a staple in private‑company acquisitions, especially as buyers seek to limit upfront cash outlays while sellers aim to capture upside potential. The surge in usage—highlighted by the ABA’s 2023 study—has exposed a paradox: the very mechanism designed to align interests often becomes a litigation trigger when performance benchmarks are ambiguous. By anchoring earnout targets to straightforward revenue metrics rather than earnings, parties can sidestep the complex adjustments that typically fuel disputes, creating a more transparent path to contingent payments.

Beyond metric selection, the contractual language governing accounting practices is paramount. Parties must spell out revenue recognition methods, treatment of doubtful accounts, expense allocations, and any EBITDA adjustments in precise terms. Involving a CPA during the drafting phase ensures that the agreed‑upon calculations align with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and reflect the business’s historical reporting. Attaching a detailed financial model as an exhibit further cements a shared understanding, providing a concrete reference point should disagreements arise.

Finally, proactive dispute‑resolution mechanisms can prevent earnout disagreements from escalating to court. Designating a neutral CPA firm as a referee, coupled with a fast‑track arbitration clause, offers a clear, enforceable pathway to resolve accounting conflicts swiftly. These safeguards not only reduce legal expenses but also preserve the post‑sale relationship, allowing the seller to continue contributing to the business’s success during the earnout period. Implementing these best practices transforms earnouts from a source of uncertainty into a strategic tool that balances risk and reward for both sides.

Earnout Burnout- Drafting Earnout Agreements to Minimize Disputes Following the Sale of Private Companies

Comments

Want to join the conversation?

Loading comments...