Opposing Counsel Claims You Have No Case! But S/He Still Wants to Negotiate. What Gives?

Why It Matters

Understanding defense’s mixed signals equips claimants to negotiate more effectively and anticipate the financial and strategic challenges inherent in employment litigation.

Key Takeaways

• Defense counsel denies liability but still seeks informal settlement.
• Negotiations aim to avoid losing control to the court.
• Employment attorneys juggle legal advocacy and client counseling.
• High fees stem from case complexity and emotional client demands.
• Rural states lack specialized plaintiff employment lawyers, raising costs.

Summary

The video dissects a common scenario where defense counsel publicly denies any merit to a plaintiff’s claim yet signals willingness to engage in informal negotiations. The hosts explain why this contradictory stance is a strategic move rather than a genuine concession.

They outline three typical demand‑letter outcomes: immediate acceptance (rare), low‑ball counteroffers, and a pragmatic middle‑ground negotiation. Defense attorneys hedge their language, refusing to admit liability while tacitly acknowledging risk, aiming to keep the dispute out of court where judges and scheduling can erode their control.

Notable remarks include, “We completely disagree… but we’re willing to talk,” and the counsel’s advice to clients: “Don’t make life decisions based on the case; make decisions based on your life.” The discussion also touches on the emotional toll of employment litigation, the need for counseling skills, and the scarcity of specialized plaintiff employment lawyers in many states.

The implications are clear: plaintiffs must read between the lines of a defense’s “no‑case” claim, negotiate wisely to preserve leverage, and recognize the high cost structure of employment law—exacerbated by limited plaintiff representation in rural markets.

Original Description

I actively track the comments on these videos and try to respond within 24 hours, so please feel free to reach out. However, be careful not to share identifying information about yourself on this publicly viewable forum. Consider hitting the like and subscribe buttons or even just commenting below. Doing so helps me help more people like you.

If you have a question about employment law, workplace discrimination, or sexual harassment, please do not hesitate to contact us. We will try to craft a video response for you, or where more appropriate, we are happy to have a private conversation.

At our firm, we believe everybody works - but not everybody wins. You need to be smart out there.

The Merch: https://www.bonfire.com/store/nyc-job-attorney/

Learn more about our firm here: https://www.NYCJobAttorney.com

See our cases and results in the press here: https://www.nycjobattorney.com/press/

Some jurisdictions may consider this attorney advertising, although advertising is not the intent of these videos.

This answer does not constitute legal advice and you should contact an attorney to confirm or research further any statements made in this answer. Any statements of fact or law I have made in this answer pertain solely to Federal law as construed within the EEOC or the laws of New York State and should not be relied upon in any way in any other jurisdiction.