Rethinking Violence Through Netflix Drama "Toxic Town" | Coffee Break Research at LSE
Why It Matters
Recognizing structural and environmental violence forces policymakers to hold the state accountable, potentially preventing intergenerational health crises and reshaping how the law protects vulnerable communities.
Key Takeaways
- •Toxic waste exposure linked to intergenerational health crises in Corby
- •Legal definition of violence overlooks structural and slow harms
- •Austerity policies exacerbate stigma toward disabled and unemployed
- •State accountability absent for industrial and environmental injustices
- •Netflix drama spotlights need for public inquiry and policy reform
Summary
The talk examines how the Netflix series “Toxic Town” reframes violence by exposing the long‑term health fallout from toxic‑waste dumping in Corby, a former steel‑town in England, and by questioning the criminal law’s narrow focus on interpersonal force.
The speaker traces the evolution from pre‑modern acceptance of physical coercion to Enlightenment‑era ideals of the rational man, arguing that modern state mechanisms have shifted violence from overt blows to structural harms—unemployment, welfare cuts, and environmental contamination—that disproportionately affect the poorest.
He cites the 2009 High Court ruling that held the local authority liable for prenatal exposure, the 50 % higher lung‑cancer rate in Corby, a GP’s dismissal of occupational causes in favor of smoking, and the recent class‑action suit against British Steel insurers as concrete illustrations of this “slow violence.”
The analysis calls for a legal redefinition of violence to include toxic and policy‑driven harms, a public inquiry into Corby’s brownfield housing, and broader policy reforms, warning that similar hidden injuries may be emerging in other post‑industrial communities worldwide.
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...