Judgmentalism vs Discernment (Excerpt)

Why It Matters

The distinction matters for public discourse and personal decision-making: promoting discernment over reflexive judgment can reduce social polarization and improve leadership, teaching, and interpersonal outcomes. Mindful judgment helps preserve constructive critique while avoiding the harms of snap, amplified condemnation.

Summary

The speaker distinguishes harmful judgmentalism from necessary discernment, arguing that spirituality criticizes reactive, attachment-driven judgments rather than the everyday capacity to assess situations. He describes judgmentalism as a pervasive, tech-amplified epidemic that creates social chaos when people cling to quick, unreflective opinions. Discernment, by contrast, is a calm, wise capacity to see clearly without emotional reactivity and is essential for clarity and effective guidance. Even spiritual teachers must make judgments—rooted in compassion and clarity—not to be liked but to help others grow.

Original Description

Adya distinguishes the difference between judgmentalism and discernment, noting the limitations of judgmentalism as opposed to the clarity found through discernment. Excerpted from March 8, 2023, Broadcast, “The Quiet Spaces”: http://bit.ly/404UPB5.

YOUTUBE MEMBERSHIP INVITATION: Join Adyashanti’s YouTube community at the BASIC MEMBERSHIP level and get access to the full-length video of THIS TALK plus OTHER FULL-LENGTH TEACHINGS every month. https://www.youtube.com/user/adyashanti/join

Quote from this Video: “We come to our spirituality with a whole host of judgments that don’t have a lot to do with discernment—they are often pretty conditional, quite reactive and quick, and don’t have a lot of consciousness or self-reflection in them.” https://adyashanti.org

#Adyashanti #OpenGateSangha #SpiritualAwakening #enlightenment #meditation