Why It Matters
The decision drives scalability, security posture, operational cost and vendor risk: picking EVPN/VXLAN can enable cloud-like mobility and fine-grained policy at scale, while trad core can minimize complexity and cost for smaller or less dynamic environments.
Summary
The hosts and guest compare traditional core ("trad core") three-tier designs—SVIs, VLANs and spanning tree—with EVPN/VXLAN overlays for data centers and campuses. Trad core remains simple, familiar and effective for many networks, while EVPN/VXLAN offers massive segment scaling, workload mobility, and stronger identity-based policy but adds protocol complexity, operational overhead and interoperability challenges. Practical limits persist—VXLAN’s large VNI space still typically maps to a 4,000-VLAN reality—and multi-vendor EVPN deployments can be problematic without mature automation and skill. The panel concludes both architectures are valid; the right choice depends on scale, operational capability, and business requirements.
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...