Aerospace Blogs and Articles
  • All Technology
  • AI
  • Autonomy
  • B2B Growth
  • Big Data
  • BioTech
  • ClimateTech
  • Consumer Tech
  • Cybersecurity
  • DevOps
  • Digital Marketing
  • Ecommerce
  • EdTech
  • Enterprise
  • FinTech
  • GovTech
  • Hardware
  • HealthTech
  • HRTech
  • LegalTech
  • Nanotech
  • PropTech
  • Quantum
  • Robotics
  • SaaS
  • SpaceTech
AllNewsDealsSocialBlogsVideosPodcastsDigests
HomeIndustryAerospaceBlogsChange Incorporation, Configuration Control, and the High Cost of Getting It Wrong
Change Incorporation, Configuration Control, and the High Cost of Getting It Wrong
AerospaceManufacturing

Change Incorporation, Configuration Control, and the High Cost of Getting It Wrong

•March 18, 2026
Leeham News and Analysis
Leeham News and Analysis•Mar 18, 2026

Key Takeaways

  • •Boeing built 30+ 777‑9s before FAA certification.
  • •Change incorporation delays add months to delivery schedule.
  • •Past 737 MAX and 787 rework highlighted high costs.
  • •Configuration discipline lapses caused Alaska Airlines door‑plug incident.
  • •Shadow factories increased rework complexity and inventory costs.

Summary

Boeing has assembled more than 30 Boeing 777‑9 airframes while the type certificate remains pending, exposing the program to extensive change incorporation work. Earlier, the 737 MAX grounding and 787 production flaws forced costly rework through shadow factories, taking months per aircraft. Recent door‑plug separation on an Alaska Airlines flight highlighted deficiencies in parts removal and reinstallation processes, underscoring configuration discipline gaps. The combination of pre‑certification production and inadequate change control threatens delivery timelines and adds significant expense.

Pulse Analysis

Launching production before final certification is a strategic gamble that can accelerate cash flow but creates a hidden liability. Manufacturers bank on early deliveries to meet contractual obligations and recoup development spend, yet any subsequent design change forces a retro‑fit of already‑built airframes. This change incorporation process consumes engineering resources, extends supply‑chain timelines, and inflates labor costs, eroding the very financial advantage the early start intended to secure.

The aerospace sector has already felt the sting of this approach. Boeing’s 737 MAX grounding and the 787’s production flaws required massive rework efforts, often conducted in so‑called shadow factories. Those initiatives stretched over months per aircraft, driving up labor expenses and tying up inventory that could not be delivered. The experience demonstrated that insufficient configuration discipline not only raises direct costs but also jeopardizes safety compliance and brand credibility.

The current 777X program illustrates the ongoing risk. With more than 30 unfinished 777‑9s awaiting FAA sign‑off, Boeing faces an uncertain change incorporation timeline. The recent Alaska Airlines door‑plug incident, traced to lapses in parts removal and reinstallation, has intensified scrutiny on Boeing’s configuration control. Until Boeing tightens its change management processes and aligns production with regulatory milestones, the airline market can expect delayed deliveries, higher prices, and continued reputational challenges.

Change Incorporation, Configuration Control, and the High Cost of Getting It Wrong

Read Original Article

Comments

Want to join the conversation?

Aerospace Pulse

EMAIL DIGESTS

Daily

Every morning

Weekly

Tuesday recap

Top Publishers

  • The Verge AI

    The Verge AI

    21 followers

  • TechCrunch AI

    TechCrunch AI

    19 followers

  • Crunchbase News AI

    Crunchbase News AI

    15 followers

  • TechRadar

    TechRadar

    15 followers

  • Hacker News

    Hacker News

    13 followers

See More →

Top Creators

  • Ryan Allis

    Ryan Allis

    194 followers

  • Elon Musk

    Elon Musk

    78 followers

  • Sam Altman

    Sam Altman

    68 followers

  • Mark Cuban

    Mark Cuban

    56 followers

  • Jack Dorsey

    Jack Dorsey

    39 followers

See More →

Top Companies

  • SaasRise

    SaasRise

    196 followers

  • Anthropic

    Anthropic

    39 followers

  • OpenAI

    OpenAI

    21 followers

  • Hugging Face

    Hugging Face

    15 followers

  • xAI

    xAI

    12 followers

See More →

Top Investors

  • Andreessen Horowitz

    Andreessen Horowitz

    16 followers

  • Y Combinator

    Y Combinator

    15 followers

  • Sequoia Capital

    Sequoia Capital

    12 followers

  • General Catalyst

    General Catalyst

    8 followers

  • A16Z Crypto

    A16Z Crypto

    5 followers

See More →
NewsDealsSocialBlogsVideosPodcasts