Heterojunction Vs. TOPCon in Perovskite-Silicon Tandem

Heterojunction Vs. TOPCon in Perovskite-Silicon Tandem

PV Magazine USA
PV Magazine USAApr 7, 2026

Why It Matters

Closing the VOC gap and reducing manufacturing costs positions TOPCon as the most commercially viable silicon bottom cell for next‑generation perovskite‑silicon tandems, accelerating market adoption and cost‑effective clean‑energy deployment.

Key Takeaways

  • TOPCon VOC gap to HJT now under 10 mV
  • TOPCon manufacturing capex 2–3× lower than HJT
  • Fill factor >84% for TOPCon, approaching HJT levels
  • LCOE comparable despite lower efficiency due to cheaper fabrication
  • Research focus: double‑side texturing, thinner poly‑Si, contact optimization

Pulse Analysis

The race to commercialize perovskite‑silicon tandem solar cells hinges on the silicon bottom cell’s ability to deliver high voltage, low recombination, and cost‑effective scalability. Historically, heterojunction (HJT) technology held a modest VOC advantage thanks to its intrinsic amorphous silicon passivation layers, but recent advances in tunnel‑oxide passivated contacts have eroded that lead. By leveraging laser‑assisted firing and refined metallization, TOPCon cells now achieve VOCs around 740 mV and fill factors exceeding 84%, narrowing the performance gap to a negligible 10 mV. This convergence reshapes the efficiency‑cost trade‑off that has long favored HJT in laboratory settings.

Beyond raw performance, TOPCon’s manufacturing footprint delivers a decisive economic edge. The process requires only 8–10 steps, utilizes low‑pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD) tools, and tolerates a broader wafer quality spectrum thanks to poly‑silicon gettering. Consequently, the capital expenditure per gigawatt of TOPCon production lines is estimated at two to three times lower than that of HJT lines, aligning closely with mature PERC infrastructure. When modeled against levelized cost of energy (LCOE), the modest efficiency shortfall of TOPCon‑based tandems is offset by these cost savings, yielding parity or even advantage over HJT‑based counterparts.

Nevertheless, TOPCon must overcome specific technical hurdles to fully unlock tandem potential. Maintaining robust surface passivation on double‑sided textured wafers, curbing parasitic absorption in poly‑silicon contacts, and ensuring thermal stability during high‑temperature perovskite integration remain active research fronts. The proposed roadmap—targeting thinner doped poly‑Si layers, sub‑micron texturing, and hydrogen‑rich capping—aims to boost both optical and electrical performance. With industry leaders like JinkoSolar, Trina Solar, and Hanwha Q‑Cells already investing in TOPCon‑based tandems, the technology is poised to become the cornerstone of large‑scale, low‑cost solar deployment.

Heterojunction vs. TOPCon in perovskite-silicon tandem

Comments

Want to join the conversation?

Loading comments...