Sign up for NYC Riskgaming This Thursday Plus DC on 3/25

Key Takeaways

• NYC Riskgaming alpha test limited to ten participants
• Scenario "Flagship Down" examines university economics and politics
• Event runs March 19, 5–8 pm ET, Flatiron
• DC policy breakfast focuses on accelerating defense tech acquisition
• Panel includes Manhattan Institute president, Palantir naval head

Summary

The blog announces two upcoming events: a Riskgaming alpha test in New York City on March 19, featuring the new "Flagship Down" scenario that explores modern university politics and economics, and a policy breakfast in Washington, D.C. on March 25 focused on accelerating defense‑industrial procurement. The NYC session is limited to ten participants and runs from 5‑8 pm ET at Flatiron. The DC panel, co‑hosted with the Manhattan Institute, includes Reihan Salam, Judge Glock, and Palantir’s Matt Babin, and will run 8‑9:30 am ET near the Capitol.

Pulse Analysis

Riskgaming’s upcoming alpha test in Manhattan provides a rare glimpse into the intersection of game design and higher‑education policy. "Flagship Down" simulates the financial pressures and governance challenges facing research universities, allowing participants to experiment with strategic decisions in a controlled environment. By capping attendance at ten, the organizers aim for an intimate feedback loop, ensuring that gameplay mechanics align with real‑world academic dynamics before a broader launch. Early adopters gain both networking opportunities and influence over the scenario’s final shape.

The Washington, D.C. policy breakfast, organized with the Manhattan Institute, addresses a persistent bottleneck in U.S. defense procurement: the lag between technological innovation and field deployment. Panelists such as Reihan Salam, Judge Glock, and Palantir’s Matt Babin will discuss leveraging existing DoD acquisition tools to act like a disciplined commercial customer, reducing red tape while preserving competition. Their insights are especially relevant as the Pentagon seeks to modernize the defense industrial base amid rising great‑power rivalry, making the conversation a bellwether for upcoming legislative and budgetary reforms.

Together, these events illustrate how experiential formats—whether a tabletop scenario or a policy roundtable—can accelerate learning and decision‑making across sectors. Participants in the Riskgaming test will experience the complexities of university funding, while the policy breakfast attendees will grapple with the mechanics of defense spending. Both gatherings foster cross‑disciplinary dialogue, positioning attendees to influence future strategies in education finance and national security procurement, two domains increasingly linked by technology and talent pipelines.