Resource Use, Physical Flows, and Costs of Select Technologies and Facilities in U.S. Chemicals, Cement, Iron and Steel, Food, and Non-Manufacturing Industries

Resource Use, Physical Flows, and Costs of Select Technologies and Facilities in U.S. Chemicals, Cement, Iron and Steel, Food, and Non-Manufacturing Industries

Research Square – News/Updates
Research Square – News/UpdatesMar 16, 2026

Why It Matters

Provides analysts a unified baseline for cross‑sector comparison, accelerating policy and investment decisions in decarbonization.

Key Takeaways

  • Dataset spans 6 manufacturing and 3 non‑manufacturing sectors.
  • Includes 36 ammonia and 97 cement plant inventories.
  • Standardizes costs to 2018 USD with common feedstock baselines.
  • Offers qualitative and quantitative estimates for emerging technologies.
  • Supports energy‑system optimization and integrated‑assessment modeling.

Pulse Analysis

The release of a comprehensive, industry‑wide dataset marks a pivotal step for analysts seeking granular insight into U.S. industrial production. Covering six core manufacturing sectors—ammonia, cement, ethanol, ethylene and propylene, iron and steel, and food—alongside agriculture, mining, and construction, the collection aggregates facility‑level inventories and technology options into a single JSON array. By pulling from federal agencies, industry reports, and academic studies, the dataset offers a rare, cross‑sector snapshot that can be directly imported into energy‑system models or benchmarking tools.

A key strength lies in its rigorous standardization. All cost figures are indexed to 2018 USD, with common feedstock and fuel baselines applied to normalize operating expenses. Capital costs incorporate chemical‑engineering plant‑cost‑index factors, ensuring comparability across disparate processes. For manufacturing, the inventory lists 36 ammonia, 97 cement, 201 ethanol, 35 ethylene/propylene, and 102 iron‑and‑steel plants, while non‑manufacturing entries provide low/average/high estimates for 18 emerging technology options. This uniform framework eliminates the need for ad‑hoc conversions, allowing analysts to focus on scenario development and sensitivity analysis.

The implications extend beyond academic research. Policymakers can leverage the dataset to evaluate decarbonization pathways, assess the economic viability of emerging technologies, and design targeted incentives. Investors gain a clearer picture of cost trajectories and resource intensity across sectors, supporting more informed capital allocation. As the energy transition accelerates, such a harmonized data foundation will be essential for aligning regulatory goals with industry realities and for tracking progress toward national emissions targets.

Resource use, physical flows, and costs of select technologies and facilities in U.S. chemicals, cement, iron and steel, food, and non-manufacturing industries

Comments

Want to join the conversation?

Loading comments...