Why Marathon's Richards Is Worried About Direct Lending

Why Marathon's Richards Is Worried About Direct Lending

Bloomberg – Technology
Bloomberg – TechnologyApr 7, 2026

Why It Matters

The looming software‑sector defaults could trigger sizable losses for private‑credit portfolios, prompting a reallocation of capital toward lower‑leverage, asset‑backed strategies and reshaping the private‑credit market landscape.

Key Takeaways

  • Software direct loans face 15% default, low recoveries.
  • Leverage levels reached 8‑10x, now considered excessive.
  • Opportunistic credit offers higher spreads, better covenants.
  • Asset‑based “halo” lending gains appeal amid software distress.
  • Investor redemption caps limit liquidity stress in private credit funds.

Pulse Analysis

Direct lending has long been a cornerstone of private credit, but the software niche is now showing signs of severe stress. Excessive leverage—often eight to ten times earnings—combined with a recent 50% valuation correction has left many borrowers vulnerable. Richards’ projection of a 15% default rate, coupled with recovery rates potentially as low as 20% of face value, suggests that the sector could generate substantial write‑downs for lenders that remain over‑exposed. This scenario underscores the importance of rigorous underwriting and realistic leverage caps in future loan structures.

The disruption in software lending is creating a fertile ground for opportunistic credit funds, which thrive on market dislocations. With spreads widening by roughly 75 basis points and covenant packages tightening, these funds can capture higher yields while mitigating downside risk. Moreover, Marathon’s emphasis on asset‑based, or “halo,” lending—where loans are secured by tangible equipment such as machinery, aircraft turbines, or infrastructure—offers a more resilient risk profile. Hard‑collateral assets provide a clear recovery path, reducing reliance on volatile equity valuations and appealing to investors seeking stable, principal‑protective returns.

For institutional and retail investors, the shift has practical implications. Redemption caps and quarterly gates, once viewed as restrictive, now act as safeguards against mass outflows during periods of heightened default risk. As capital flows away from high‑leverage software loans, fund managers are likely to re‑balance portfolios toward lower‑leverage, asset‑backed exposures. This reallocation could tighten financing conditions for software firms while expanding credit availability for manufacturers and other hard‑asset sectors, ultimately reshaping the private‑credit landscape over the next few years.

Why Marathon's Richards Is Worried About Direct Lending

Comments

Want to join the conversation?

Loading comments...