Oren Cass: How Economists Failed America
Why It Matters
Adopting Cass's balanced‑economy framework could reshape U.S. trade and industrial policy, directly impacting jobs, wages, and national security in a volatile global environment.
Key Takeaways
- •Economists overemphasize consumption, neglect community, industry, and social cohesion.
- •China trade imbalance reveals flaws in free‑trade orthodoxy.
- •Historical American policy favored tariffs and national industrial strategy.
- •Post‑1990s shift to neoliberalism eroded economic resilience across sectors.
- •Restoring a balanced market requires prioritizing families, security, and jobs.
Summary
Oren Cass argues economists have failed America by focusing solely on consumption, ignoring community, family, industry, and national security. He frames the discussion as a critique of the prevailing neoliberal consensus and calls for a new "American system" of economic policy.
Cass points to the China shock, the erosion of manufacturing jobs, and the post‑1990s embrace of free‑trade dogma as evidence that the market‑only model is broken. He cites historical periods—Hamiltonian tariffs, Reagan’s strategic protectionism, and the post‑World War II industrial boom—as examples of balanced policies that delivered growth and a robust middle class.
"Economists tell us the ideal outcome is to maximize consumption while minimizing work," Cass quips, highlighting the absurdity of a consumption‑only goal. He also references Michael Boskin’s "computer chips, potato chips" remark to illustrate that not all output is equal for security or community health.
Cass urges policymakers to re‑center economic strategy on family stability, domestic industry, and supply‑chain resilience, suggesting tariffs and targeted fiscal measures as tools. If adopted, his vision could reshape trade policy, revive manufacturing, and address the political backlash fueling populist movements.
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...