Trump’s Trade Goals for Xi Meeting Seem More Chinese than American

Why It Matters

A shift away from WTO frameworks could alter global trade norms, diminishing U.S. leverage and affecting American exporters worldwide.

Key Takeaways

• Trump favors bilateral monitoring over WTO multilateralism
• Proposed changes could undermine WTO dispute system
• Critics say plan mirrors Chinese trade tactics
• Shift may weaken U.S. influence in global trade
• Potential ripple effects on supply chains worldwide

Pulse Analysis

The United States and China have long been the world’s two largest trading powers, and their interactions set the tone for global commerce. The World Trade Organization, founded to provide a rules‑based system for resolving disputes and reducing tariffs, has faced criticism for slow decision‑making and perceived bias. Yet many economists argue that the WTO remains a cornerstone for predictable trade flows, especially for smaller economies that lack the bargaining power of the U.S. or China. Recent discussions suggest that the U.S. may be reconsidering its commitment to this multilateral framework.

President Trump’s latest trade blueprint, as discussed on the CFR’s "The Spillover" podcast, proposes a shift toward bilateral monitoring agreements with China. Rather than relying on WTO mechanisms, the plan envisions joint U.S.–China committees to oversee market access, intellectual‑property enforcement, and state‑owned‑enterprise subsidies. Proponents claim this approach could deliver faster, more tailored resolutions and curb what they view as WTO inefficiencies. Detractors, however, warn that such bilateralism risks creating a de‑facto “China‑first” regime, granting Beijing greater leverage to shape rules that favor its state‑driven model while sidelining broader international standards.

If the United States moves to institutionalize bilateral oversight, the ripple effects could be profound. Companies that depend on WTO‑backed certainty may face heightened regulatory uncertainty, prompting supply‑chain realignments and increased compliance costs. Moreover, other trading partners could pressure Washington to adopt similar bilateral deals, fragmenting the global trade architecture into a patchwork of nation‑to‑nation pacts. This potential fragmentation threatens to erode the predictability that has underpinned decades of growth, making the upcoming U.S.–China dialogue a pivotal moment for the future of international trade governance.

Original Description

“Are we basically taking the World Trade Organization and gutting it and turning it into some kind of bilateral monitoring?” asks Rebecca Patterson, raising concerns that Trump and Xi’s trade proposals could sideline the WTO.

Watch or listen to the latest episode of The Spillover at the link in our bio or wherever you get your podcasts.

Watch or listen to the latest episode of The Spillover: https://youtu.be/s09FGwg90oc?si=ylQVXlu_Pfn-rFdN

Submit to win a copy of The Infinity Machine and get your question answered on The Spillover at cfr.org/giveaway

Subscribe to our channel: https://goo.gl/WCYsH7

This work represents the views and opinions solely of the author. The Council on Foreign Relations is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher, and takes no institutional positions on matters of policy.

Visit the CFR website: http://www.cfr.org

Follow CFR on X: http://www.twitter.com/cfr_org

Follow CFR on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/councilonforeignrelations/