Healthcare Videos
  • All Technology
  • AI
  • Autonomy
  • B2B Growth
  • Big Data
  • BioTech
  • ClimateTech
  • Consumer Tech
  • Cybersecurity
  • DevOps
  • Digital Marketing
  • Ecommerce
  • EdTech
  • Enterprise
  • FinTech
  • GovTech
  • Hardware
  • HealthTech
  • HRTech
  • LegalTech
  • Nanotech
  • PropTech
  • Quantum
  • Robotics
  • SaaS
  • SpaceTech
AllNewsDealsSocialBlogsVideosPodcastsDigests
HomeIndustryHealthcareVideosNEJM Clinician: Apixaban Vs. Rivaroxaban for Acute VTE
HealthcarePharmaBioTech

NEJM Clinician: Apixaban Vs. Rivaroxaban for Acute VTE

•March 16, 2026
NEJM Group
NEJM Group•Mar 16, 2026

Why It Matters

The trial demonstrates a clear safety advantage for apixaban, guiding clinicians toward a lower‑bleeding anticoagulant choice for acute VTE management.

Key Takeaways

  • •Head-to-head trial compares apixaban vs rivaroxaban in acute VTE
  • •Clinically important bleeding twice as likely with rivaroxaban
  • •Number needed to harm is 26 favoring apixaban
  • •Clot recurrence rates similar between both anticoagulants in study
  • •Dosing convenience and insurance may influence drug selection

Summary

The New England Journal of Medicine published a head‑to‑head trial evaluating apixaban (Eliquis) against rivaroxaban (Xarelto) in 2,800 patients with acute pulmonary embolism or deep‑vein thrombosis. The study provides the first direct comparative safety and efficacy data for these two widely used direct oral anticoagulants.

Over a three‑month follow‑up, clinically important bleeding occurred twice as often in the rivaroxaban arm, translating to a number needed to harm of 26. In contrast, recurrence of thrombotic events was low and virtually identical between the two groups, indicating comparable efficacy.

The presenting clinician emphasized, “a pixiban should be the preferred choice for most patients,” while acknowledging that some may favor rivaroxaban for its once‑daily dosing or due to insurance coverage constraints. The commentary underscores real‑world factors that often influence prescribing beyond pure clinical outcomes.

For providers, the findings suggest prioritizing apixaban when safety is paramount, especially in patients at higher bleeding risk. Payers and formulary committees may also reconsider drug placement, balancing the modest convenience advantage of rivaroxaban against its higher bleeding liability.

Original Description

Is apixaban safer than rivaroxaban for acute venous thromboembolism (VTE)?
NEJM Clinician Editor-in-Chief, Raja-Elie Abdulnour, MD, describes the first head-to-head trial comparing the bleeding risks of these two direct-acting oral anticoagulants. Visit clinician.nejm.org for the full context and comment.

Comments

Want to join the conversation?

Loading comments...

Healthcare Pulse

EMAIL DIGESTS

Daily

Every morning

Weekly

Tuesday recap

Top Publishers

  • The Verge AI

    The Verge AI

    21 followers

  • TechCrunch AI

    TechCrunch AI

    19 followers

  • Crunchbase News AI

    Crunchbase News AI

    15 followers

  • TechRadar

    TechRadar

    15 followers

  • Hacker News

    Hacker News

    13 followers

See More →

Top Creators

  • Ryan Allis

    Ryan Allis

    194 followers

  • Elon Musk

    Elon Musk

    78 followers

  • Sam Altman

    Sam Altman

    68 followers

  • Mark Cuban

    Mark Cuban

    56 followers

  • Jack Dorsey

    Jack Dorsey

    39 followers

See More →

Top Companies

  • SaasRise

    SaasRise

    196 followers

  • Anthropic

    Anthropic

    39 followers

  • OpenAI

    OpenAI

    21 followers

  • Hugging Face

    Hugging Face

    15 followers

  • xAI

    xAI

    12 followers

See More →

Top Investors

  • Andreessen Horowitz

    Andreessen Horowitz

    16 followers

  • Y Combinator

    Y Combinator

    15 followers

  • Sequoia Capital

    Sequoia Capital

    12 followers

  • General Catalyst

    General Catalyst

    8 followers

  • A16Z Crypto

    A16Z Crypto

    5 followers

See More →
NewsDealsSocialBlogsVideosPodcasts