Nine Month Wait Times and a Scheduling System No One Could Trust - SOL
Why It Matters
Shortening specialist wait times through reliable scheduling directly boosts patient outcomes and operational efficiency, forcing health systems to move beyond vendor‑centric workflows.
Key Takeaways
- •Patients face 9‑10 month specialist appointment delays for care
- •Clinicians experience smooth in‑clinic flow but lack scheduling control
- •System customization led to unintended gaps in patient experience
- •Proposed fix: schedule patient first, then process authorizations backward
- •Adopt industry‑wide best‑practice scheduling rather than relying solely on Epic
Summary
The video highlights a chronic nine‑to‑ten‑month wait for specialist appointments at a health system, exposing a scheduling platform that clinicians cannot trust.
While clinicians report that once patients are in the clinic the visit runs smoothly, patients endure months of silence after referrals. Attempts to “customize” the electronic health record’s scheduling module created a reverse‑engineered workflow that left patients without a concrete appointment date, forcing them to chase authorizations for an indeterminate period.
As one interviewee explains, “you get the patient on the schedule so they know when they’re going to be seen and then you work backward… within two weeks you’ll complete the authorization.” The discussion underscores that reverting to industry‑wide best‑practice—booking the appointment first and then securing authorizations—offers a clear, patient‑centric solution.
Implementing this approach could slash wait times, improve patient satisfaction, and reduce administrative overhead, compelling health systems to reassess reliance on vendor‑specific defaults and prioritize transparent scheduling.
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...