The Ultimate Hard Asset: American Farmland and The 300-Year Water Supply Hidden Underneath It
Why It Matters
Farmland’s low correlation with traditional markets and its embedded water and renewable‑energy rights give investors a durable hedge against inflation, supply‑chain shocks, and climate risk, reshaping real‑asset allocation strategies.
Key Takeaways
- •Institutional farmland yields mid‑teen returns, beating S&P 500
- •Farmland shows low or negative correlation with equities and Treasuries
- •Water rights and scarcity will become major valuation drivers in the Midsouth
- •Aging farmer demographics create opportunities for institutional ownership and partnerships
- •Renewable energy and mineral rights add supplemental cash flow to farmland assets
Summary
The episode of “Other People’s Money” spotlights American farmland as the ultimate hard asset, featuring Chris Morris, president of Landfund Partners, an institutional investor managing over $400 million of irrigated row‑crop land in the U.S. Midsouth. Morris explains why water‑rich farmland is a strategic hedge against supply‑chain disruptions, geopolitical risk, and fiat‑currency debasement.
Morris notes that the sector delivers mid‑teen net returns and has outperformed the S&P 500 since the Evergreen fund’s launch in 2021. He emphasizes farmland’s exceptionally low correlation with equities, the Nasdaq, and even 10‑year Treasury yields, positioning it as a true diversifier within real‑asset portfolios.
He cites the aging farmer population—average age 59—and the looming succession wave as a catalyst for institutional ownership. A recent UN report that more than six billion people face water stress underscores the premium on water rights, while data‑center expansion and renewable‑energy leases are creating new cash‑flow overlays on traditional farm rents.
For investors, the message is clear: farmland combines tangible food production, secure water access, and ancillary revenue streams, making it a resilient, inflation‑hedging asset in an era of climate uncertainty and macro‑economic volatility.
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Loading comments...