Paul Saladino Eats Vegetables!? | What the Fitness | Biolayne

Biolayne (Layne Norton, PhD)
Biolayne (Layne Norton, PhD)May 1, 2026

Why It Matters

Saladino’s public diet reversals highlight the danger of influencers making absolute nutritional claims, influencing consumer choices and shaping broader health discourse.

Key Takeaways

  • Saladino adds asparagus, signaling shift from strict carnivore.
  • His diet evolution reflects broader debate on optimal human nutrition.
  • Critics note his health claims often conflict with scientific consensus.
  • Recent carbohydrate reintroduction improves his energy and muscle glycogen.
  • Frequent diet pivots undermine credibility of his 'optimal diet' messaging.

Summary

The video examines Paul Saladino’s latest dietary pivot: incorporating asparagus and other vegetables after years of championing a strict carnivore regimen. Known for his “animal‑based” label and a best‑selling book proclaiming meat as the optimal human fuel, Saladino now showcases a plate with green stalks, signaling a notable shift.

The host outlines Saladino’s nutritional timeline—from raw vegan beginnings, through an all‑meat phase, to the recent addition of fruit, honey, and starches. He argues that the newfound energy stems from restored muscle glycogen rather than electrolyte balance, and points out that Saladino’s health complaints on pure carnivore coincided with the period he was writing his book.

Key moments include the host’s sarcastic “Game of Thrones Lannister arc” analogy and the quotation about sodium‑glucose co‑transport, used to debunk Saladino’s electrolyte excuse. The video also references Saladino’s own admissions of past errors on LDL, BCAAs, and fasting, underscoring a pattern of evolving opinions.

The broader implication is a cautionary tale for consumers: diet influencers who repeatedly claim a single “optimal” regimen risk credibility when personal experience contradicts their proclamations. Emphasizing whole, nutrient‑dense foods and minimizing ultra‑processed items remains sound advice, but it should be grounded in consensus science rather than personal narrative.

Original Description

Vegetables are Back on the Menu for @paulsaladinomd
This is a wild ass character arc for Paul and to be clear I have no issue with someone changing their diet and I DO applaud Paul for being honest about changing it, but it would be much more meaningful if he had some contrition about his previous claims
What’s more wild is the pattern: Every diet phase = “The optimal human diet.” Until it isn’t.
Vegan → didn’t feel good
Carnivore → didn’t feel good
Add carbs → suddenly feel better
And instead of: “Hey, maybe extreme restriction isn’t optimal…” We get his explanation of: “It was electrolytes.” No. You added carbohydrates → restored muscle glycogen → improved performance and energy. This isn’t controversial.
What is a problem? Making bold claims that contradict decades of nutrition research… and selling them as fact while you’re personally struggling on the diet you’re promoting and writing a book about it.
Experiment all you want. Just stop calling every experiment “optimal for humans” when it wasn’t even optimal for you
Get my research review REPS:
biolayne.com/REPS
Get my new nutrition coaching app, Carbon Diet Coach: http://www.joincarbon.com/layne
My research based supplements: http://www.outworknutrition.com
Get my books on how to lose fat: http://www.biolaynestore.com
Take my online course "The Science of Nutrition": https://chfi.click/laynenorton_online
Get Custom Workouts by me for $12.99/month:

Comments

Want to join the conversation?

Loading comments...