Legal Videos

Lifestyle Equities CV and Another v Amazon UK Services Ltd and Others

The appeal before the UK Supreme Court concerns whether Amazon’s global website, Amazon.com, constitutes a use of Lifestyle Equities’ trademark in the United Kingdom. The core dispute hinges on the legal test for "targeting" – whether the mere ability to ship goods to the UK creates jurisdiction for trademark infringement, or whether a more nuanced, multi‑factor analysis is required. The appellant argues that the trial judge, Mr Justice Michael Green, correctly applied a comprehensive, fact‑based approach, weighing website design, default delivery settings, consumer expectations, and the overall commercial context. By contrast, the Court of Appeal was criticised for focusing narrowly on the final “review your order” page, effectively extending UK jurisdiction based on a single transactional step. Key examples cited include the “picker box” default destination, the presence of a “We ship internationally” notice, and Amazon’s own admissions that it had previously restricted UK sales on its global store after the trial. The judge’s observation that the full consumer journey, not isolated pages, must inform the targeting analysis was highlighted as pivotal. The decision underscores that a website’s capacity to deliver to the UK does not automatically trigger trademark liability. It reinforces a precedent that courts must assess the totality of online interactions, limiting over‑broad extraterritorial claims and providing clearer guidance for multinational e‑commerce platforms.