Technology Social Media and Updates

B‑players Compound, Killing Company Output Exponentially

Hiring B-players destroys you exponentially. Here’s the math nobody told me early in my career: A-player = 1.0 unit 90% hire = 0.9 units 80% hire = 0.8 units If your company is designed to run on 90% hires, every B-player you keep creates a dilution multiplier of: 0.8 / 0.9 = 0.88 Your output decays as your org scales: (0.8/0.9)^N Where N = number of B-players you allow in the system. 1 B-player → 0.88 units 5 B-players → 0.56 units 10 B-players → 0.31 units 20 B-players → 0.09 units At 20 B-players, you’ve quietly killed 91% of your expected output. And here’s the part founders learn too late: Your company doesn’t die because of one bad hire. It dies because you kept ten of them for too long - and let the compounding drag choke your velocity. I’ve lived this. Every time I held onto a B-player to “protect morale,” “avoid disruption,” or “hope they’d improve,” the entire team paid the interest on that decision for months. This is why scaling feels impossible for so many companies. It’s not the market. It’s not the strategy. It’s not the competition. It’s the math. B-players kill scaling. Protect the castle at all costs. 🏰